"When John Fleton (Luke Wilson), a depressed suburban family man and recently fired realtor, offers to help a stranger, Richie (Samuel Jackson), with his car, John is sucked into a surreal, nightmarish murder spree that forces him to question everything about his life, his mode of behavior, and the very nature of evil."
Samuel Jackson as Richie
Starring:
Samuel Jackson
Luke Wilson
Director:
Chris Fischer
If you thought this was a cerebral thriller, you were wrong. It gets a 1 star from every critic and even audiences didn't like it. Samuel Jackson obviously is trying to pad his paycheck by doing these horrible films.
On the one hand it is good to see a Black person as the villain, with intelligence and more to him than just shooting and cursing, however Samuel Jackson has only one setting for his acting, shooting and cursing.
Luke Wilson as John
The film pretends it's a psychological thriller, but it ends up being nothing more than a hired killer turned good guy, turned bad guy, turned good guy. And, of course in the end the white people turn on the Black guy, even in the face of the Black guy revealing that the truly guilty person is the white woman. And the only other Black person in the movie ends up killing him. That's what Hollywood wants to beat into our brains: Black on Black crime.
Oh and there is a scene straight out of gone with the wind, where the white woman Joanie (Leslie Bibb), the wife, is flanked by her children and tells off the negro she-cop Latisha (Tracie Thoms). Subconsciously it says "the white woman put the nigger woman in her place", once again. The irony is that the audience is mislead into rooting for the white woman, but we are later shamed because the truly evil person in the movie is this same white woman.
Leslie Bibb as Joanie
The scene was unnecessary and lent nothing to the movie. It did not lead to anything else following it. It was simply put in the movie to hammer home the idea and visual that the 90lb white woman put a nigger in her place, even though she was a police officer.
The entire movie is formulaic and as a Black man, we are still subconsciously put in our place. You cannot just have the killer, happen to be Black. The racial undertones were blatant and obvious: nigger stay in your place. But, then again, that is nearly every Hollywood movie, isn't it?
Watch this entire video, then go read about the Colorado shooting, and look at all the evidence. James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News.
According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as “shy.”
James Holmes Said He Thought to Dye his Hair
Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. “It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this,” he said. “He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games…”
“After his arrest, Holmes told police about ‘possible explosives in his residence,’ Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time.”
“He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were ‘something I’ve never seen.’ One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes’ car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting.”
In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps… c’mon, this isn’t a “lone gunman.” This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, and then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.
Many Bomb and Shooting Experts Say Only Someone Highly Trained and Well Funded Could Have Pulled this off
According to the N Y Times, Holmes apparently has no background. “He’s not on anybody’s radar screen — nothing,” said a peace officer in a NYT article. “This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him.”
Mr. Holmes’s only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor’s degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver’s Anschutz Medical Campus… He was currently collecting unemployment…
If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, “flammable” booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform, and all the rest of it?
Think back to the "Hellraiser" movies and the one where the child opens the puzzle box. When the demon shows up, the child asks if he is coming to take him to hell and pinhead answers "it is not the hands that open the box, but the mind behind it."
I believe the Colorado shooter, IF HE EVEN WAS THE ONE DOING THE SHOOTING, was not the mind behind the shooting. Either he was coerced into a confession, because the shooter was dressed head to toe in riot gear, and no one could see his face, or he was hypnotized to carry out the shooting, which takes months, if not years of preparation by the hypnotist.
Watch the video and see.
So the question you have to ask yourself is: Does a medical student, who was on unemployment, with only a parking ticket on his record, who was shy, who enjoyed video games, who was a good student just suddenly buy $20,000 worth of equipment, set up intricate flaming military grade bombs, outfit himself head to toe in military grade riot gear, train himself to carry out a full invasion operation with gas, smoke and automatic weapons?
Or is it more logical that they captured this poor shy med student, hypnotized him in a psycho medical laboratory experiment, trained him, funded all of his equipment, since he was on unemployment, setup sophisticated bombs for him, then finish him off to give himself up as the fall guy, so that whoever really did all this gets away scott free.
My money is on the 2nd explanation. Because of one simple fact. IF NOTHING ELSE IS TRUE, YOU CANNOT BUY $20,000 WORTH OF EQUIPMENT WHILE ON UNEMPLOYMENT. Any fool knows that. So where did he get the money? Where did he get the training? He was a med student, where did he get the time to learn all this?
Go back to that video and see that the hypnotist, in a matter of 10 seconds turned someone, who couldn't shoot a gun, into a marksman. You do not have time to do much of anything, while in med school. But, if someone could grab you for 5 minutes every night for 6 months, and hypnotize you, they could turn you into an expert anything.
In the African world, and African religions, the woman is viewed and treated as an equal. There was a god and a goddess. There was a king and a queen. They felt, and rightly so, that you could not have one without the other.
The Egyptian oral tradition even stated that you cannot have man without woman. You cannot have a world full of humans without man and woman.
The Supreme gods of the Ewe of Ghana are Mawu-Lisa. They are twins. Mawu, the female is represented by the moon, while Lisa the male is represented by the sun. As husband and wife , Mawu-Lisa had seven pairs of twins which became the major gods of the Ewe. What is of major interest to us is the red wooden statue with large breasts and a crescent in one hand found among the Ewe. This image of Mawu is the only known image of the Supreme Being in Africa.
The Akan of Ghana have a similar view of God. The Ashanti for example, have sometimes thought of Nyame the SUPREME BEING as both male and female. The female principle is symbolized by the moon which created human beings with water. The male principle is symbolized by the sun. The sun shot life-giving fire into the human veins and made human beings live. Generally however, the women is seen as the MOTHER of humankind, from whom all people originated.
The Akposso [of Togo] tell that when God made human beings, he first made woman on the earth and bore her the first child, the first human being. The main idea here, says Mbiti, is to link human life directly with God through the woman. The woman herself is created by God and in turn becomes the instrument of human life
It is not until the introduction of Europeans, that we get a rather skewed view of Africa. They, the Europeans, wrote all of the histories, memoirs and recollections of Africa from a male-centric point of view, with a male-centric concentration. Meaning, they only talked about the African kings they spoke with.
The white man's mind cannot even conceive of a female being equal to a male. This is one of the reasons they thought Africans were so strange.
They only referred to the African male hunters. In fact, when the native american slave trade proved to be fruitful and African gold value dropped dramatically, and they started trading in African slavery, 75% of all slaves were men. They also tortured and "re-educated" Africans to try and stamp out this notion of equality among the gender.
Even so, Black tradition has always been to honor the African female as much as the male. Even during slavery and after.
We need to return back to our African traditions. There can be no man without woman. There can be no god without goddess. There can be no king without queen. This is how our population needs to be "re-educated". Our men need to be sat down and told that the white world despises its women, but the Black world does not. We need to be taught how to distinguish between our different traditions from theirs.
Time and again Black men have said to Black women, here in America, that the "women's movement" is not necessary in the Black community. Admittedly there are some Black men who are caught up in the stupidity of a white-centric view of the gender, but they can be re-educated, and they are not the normal Black man.
We need to resolve that we need to educate each other in our history. It is far richer than the European tradition.
Turn on any talk show and you'll hear 72% of Black children are fatherless. Turn on any news show and you will hear the same thing. Turn on any talk radio and the same thing is repeated. But wait, U.S. Census statistics says 48% of Black women have never been married. That means that 58% of Black women are married, divorced or widowed.
So let's return to this 72% statistic that is being reported. The person reporting it, always comes across as if the Black child never had a father, doesn't know the father and the relationship of the parents dissolved before the child was born, complete absentee father, i.e. fatherless.
But wait, pew research shows that only 44% of Black fathers live apart from their children. Again this blows away that 72%, because that means that 56% live WITH their children. Also, research shows that of the fathers that live apart from their children, BLACK FATHERS SPEND MORE TIME WITH THEIR CHILDREN THAN ANY OTHER RACIAL GROUP.
But wait, independent research also showed that 41% of all Black children live WITH their father, either in a marriage or single-dad households. Again, that blows away that 72% statistic. Across the bored, in all research, it shows that either a strong majority or a close majority of Black children live with their fathers.
There is an old saying, "statistics don't lie, the people that used them do".
Here's another trend they are not telling you. Among all teen pregnancy, Black teen pregnancy has declined more than all other races since 1990 and is showing a trend to stay that way. Yes, that means less Black teen-age girls are having babies than white or Asian girls. [Hispanic is not a race, in case you were confused]
So we have fewer "at risk" pregnancies; Black fathers leading 41% of homes; and wait, there's more.
The Black divorce rate is only 32%. The white divorce rate is 39%. So 68% of all Black marriages stay together.
"68% of all Black marriages stay together."
Slavery and the Legacy of the Black Father
Talk to most Americans and they have no idea what slavery was. In fact, they know even less about Jim Crow. Fewer still know about segregation.
Briefly, Africans were sold on what is now known as Wallstreet. They had been captured from Africa, sent to central America to be tortured, beaten and stripped of their will, normally ending in suicide, and of those that remain 13% made it to the auction blocks of Wallstreet. These slaves, 3/4 of which were men, were sold to southern farmers for about 60 - 70 years.
Because the wealth that the southern famers had were so tremendous, the northern businessmen stopped Wallstreet from auctioning slaves, and the American revolution began. The southern states tried to remove themselves from the federal republic, and the northern states attacked them. During this time President Lincoln declared all slaves freed and to fight the white southerners.
After that civil war, the south then proceeded to institute laws to keep Blacks and Black families in the same exact situation of slavery. Northern states, who had sold Blacks on the auction blocks of Wallstreet found themselves in the position of being in direct competition with both the always free Blacks and the newly freed Blacks for business and jobs. So they too instituted laws against Black people and Black families. This was known as the Jim Crow era. And, contrary to popular belief it was all over the U.S., not just the south.
After many technological advances, and social inventions like trade unions, Blacks could be held back financial through local and private means. There was no longer any need to pass laws to keep Blacks and Black families at bay.
This started the segregation era. The southern states, who were not business oriented, still kept their Jim Crow laws in place. While Blacks were segregated all over the country, the Jim Crow south was an embarrassment to the country and it led to the first Black national financial revolution. It was stopped immediately by the federal government and the local state governments.
In a compromise effort, Black leadership agreed to stop any and all financial revolts and instead focused on trying to regulate white behavior towards Blacks.
This compromise led to the complete and utter financial ruin of all Black communities nationwide. Most Black businesses shut down and the financial wealth of the community switched from business to returning to work for the very people that enslaved, Jim Crowed, and segregated them.
During this entire time the Black family was under attack. During slavery it was the practice to simply remove the Black man and sell him to another plantation owner. During Jim Crow the Black father was simply tortured, mutilated and murdered. During segregation, again, tortured, mutilated and murdered.
In the new era after the Black financial revolution fell apart, a new Jim Crow arose. In this new era, massive incarceration takes the Black man out of the picture. No need to murder him. Simply incarcerate him during his prime years, 18 - 40, and you achieve the same exact outcome.
The method to get Black men incarcerated though had to be ramped up, because what would incarcerate a Black man, would also incarcerate a white man. So the federal government allowed for private prisons to be a new business. They introduced new harsh drugs into the Black segregated communities. Immediately they passed drug laws with unconstitutional mandatory sentencing. They trained police to target mostly Black youths, make unconstitutional stops and unconstitutional searches. This was a cocktail to make 100,000 inmates grow to millions, with most of them being young Black men.
This is the era we find ourselves in today. So, although the statistics look quite grim, the Black father is more than successful given the new Jim Crow era we find ourselves in.
Who is Behind the Black Fatherless Child Lie?
So who is behind these misleading statistics? The chief proponent of putting out this false stat has been the Democratic party, since before the 60s. They have systematically put out many false statistics for political gain, so that whites can feel secure about themselves, and Blacks can feel ashamed of themselves. Either way, all of their social programs get passed for "humanitarian" reasons. However, in every case, the Democratic social programs have ALWAYS harmed the Black family. So it is a double dose of backstabbing by the Democratic party. They lie about the state of the Black family. They pass laws that destroy the Black family.
Keeping white families at ease has always been the strategy of the Democratic party. Kennedy did nothing to help Blacks during the failed financial revolt of the 60s. For fear of reelection he did not send national guard to assist the freedom riders. For fear of reelection he did not sign into law civil rights legislation. To put white families at ease he threw Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in jail, and only released him if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. agreed to switch from the Republican party to the Democratic party.
Time and again it has been the Democratic party that has led the charge AGAINST the Black family. However, since it was Black people involved, no news organizations nor law firms nor state or federal government thought it important enough to blow the whistle. However, because it has been so ingrained in the Black community that the Democratic party is for Blacks it is nearly too late to get Black families to realize who has been doing this to them.
If we can get the drugs out of the community, all the drug laws completely removed, and get the millions of Black men released from prison, you will see a boom in the Black population and Black marriage will return to 70%, which it was during the Jim Crow, Segregation and Black financial revolution eras.
We can only do this by being scholars of politics, getting our own lobbyists at the state and federal levels and returning to real Black communities with our own businesses.
The statistic of 72% of all Black children being "fatherless" is a complete and utter lie. I have shown here that not only are Black children not fatherless, but more often than not Black children are in a married home.
You want to see the fatherless rate decrease from 40% to 0%, this is what we must do.
1. capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding, and similar forms of mental activity; aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, meanings, etc.
That definition is wrong. Why? Because it is not a capacity to learn. Why do I say that? The actual brain absorbs everything that goes on around it. There is no limitation for the brain to absorb something. If we had a machine that would replay what the brain has absorbed in a day, we'd get EVERYTHING the person has seen, felt, heard and smelled all day. So sitting in class, every student learns what is being taught.
ORDER BOOK HERE
So what is intelligence? Intelligence is the ability to put nearly everything absorbed in the brain and bring it to the forefront at a second's notice. What's 2 +2? The intelligent person can bring that up immediately. And, to the brain 2+2 is no more difficult a questioin than, "What was ratified at the treaty of Versaille?"
But, there's a new book out that goes even further to explain intelligence. It turns most concepts of what intelligence is, on its ear. Briefly it goes into the fact that intelligence is nothing more than chemicals in the brain. Also, that intelligence is nothing more than dog training, at a human level. Mozart learned whole concertos by the age of 6. Why? Because his father beat it into him. Dog training.
So, you want your kid to be "more intelligent"? or you yourself to be more intelligent, go get the worlds 100 most admired scholarly books and beat the information into you or your kid. It really is that simple.
Here's the real problem. People mischaracterize intelligence as being "smart". Smart is another word for wisdom. Nowhere has it ever been shown that an intelligent person is wise. There are plenty of nerds that would walk into a dark alley and get themselves murdered. There are plenty of nerds that would constantly inadvertently insult their girlfriends / wives and end up broken up / divorced.
Intelligence does not equal smart. Smart equals wisdom. But, hey, if you want to be intelligent, the road to it, is pretty damn simple.
I am not going to go into depth here, but the original idea to categorize IQ, intelligence quotient, was not born out of an objective wish to know, but it was another form to show that Black people were inferior to white people. When the world got smarter, people went back to look at the concept of intelligence and IQ and found that all the conclusions about race and intelligence were completely off base and patently false. Black students are no less intelligent than European or Asian students. In fact, the instance of "smart" students, or wise students are found in slightly higher quantities in Black students than the other 2 races.
It was later found that, given that the teacher knew the technique, he could "teach" any student. In fact, no racial group was found to learn at any differing speed, once the teacher was corrected.
So, I was watching youtube videos about natural hair. Then I got into the section where all these Black women make videos about how their man was being rude to them and thinking it was their natural hair. Mind you now, the dude didn't say anything about natural hair, exactly.
For example:
-they'll say the dude said, "get some braids", "get some tracks", "get a weave". Ok that might sound like the guy is talking about the hair, but he's not. What he is trying to say, but can't just come out and say it
-"Girl you are puppy as a house and you look like a garden. Get on a treadmill and put some makeup on. And you need to quit making videos cracking my computer screen with that man face."
I mean really. They need to quit playing. She know she looks like someone stuffed a black cabbage patch doll full of butter. And, another thing
-"No man is going to date a "woman" with hair shorter than his. Who is the man in the relationship?"
Then she gets all hurt that he doesn't like her fade. I mean really? Unless you're drop dead gorgeous. You cannot pull off the G.I. Jane look.
-Look, you need to stop kidding yourself. Why are you 18 and weigh 400lbs? At 18 your metabolism is supposed to be through the roof.
-Push away from the high fructose corn syrup. Stop drinking soda like it's water, IT'S NOT. Eat a carrot once in a while. There is no excuse these days not to eat like a regular sane adult.
And, the man that would be attracted to you at 350lbs, is not there to improve your self-esteem. TRUST ME ON THAT ONE!
If he sees you, and you're 350lbs, and he approaches, he's got one thing on his mind, and it's not your gender . He's thinking, "here's a heifer, I can crap all over her and she'll NEVER leave me."
Am I lying?
CONCLUSION
You have one life. This isn't about how a man treats you or mistreats you. There is no way in hell you should be walking around weighing 400lbs and you're 18. Do you even care about your life? a man. We're talking about your life, your well being. How long do you think you'll live at 400lbs?
Do you want to live long enough to see kids?
And, let's address the fake hair issue. When you wear the fake hair, you get ALL DRESSED UP, cuz you got your hair on now. But, when you get your natural, you wear t-shirts and sweat pants.
Don't lie and say you don't.
The mindset is, the fake white-people hair means you're gender , but the natural Black-people's hair is not. You just read yourself. I see so many Black women walk around with their natural hair looking like a rats nest. But, when they got somewhere to go and they press or perm or weave their hair, here they come looking like they just stepped out of Black Vogue.
Now why is that?
It's because they think, in their heart, that there is NO such thing as Black beauty. They get the natural hair and think to themselves, "I'm wearing natural hair because I don't have to take care of it." So, if they don't have to take care of it, they don't have to take care of themselves either, walking around with no moisturizer on their skin, looking like a bag-lady.
It's an insult to Black women all over. And, it should be an insult to yourself.
Finally, work on your femininity. How is it, the gay boys can step out in a tank top and jeans and look more like a lady without even make-up on than you? Don't get me wrong, I am not complimenting the gender . I'm saying, some of you look like a 5 o'clock shadow should be growing on your chin. You look rough around the edges. And, when your man tries to say "something" to you, you don't get the "hint" and blame it on him.
You should practice being a pure princess for an hour a day. Go dress up, put make-up on, the whole nine yards, and act like a girly girl princess. Practice makes perfect.
You're crying your man is being mean to you? He's dropping hints, he thinks your'e turning him gay, cuz you look and act like a man.
And, some of you swear you're "all woman". You're lying to yourself. You act like Peter Griffin on "Family Guy".
If you don't have breasts, go buy a push-up bra. If you don't have a waste, get on the treadmill. If you look like a Black shamu, stop drinking soda like it's going out of style.
Remember, I'm here for you if you need diet tips or fashion tips or some psycho-analysis. But, if you're going to continue lying to yourself, I'm here to slap you around a couple of times so you can wake up.
A huge problem in the Nubian community is that we are too quick to judge. Immediately, by me saying that, a lot of you just judged that statement and probably said to yourself "no one should judge". But, I am not talking about being judgmental in an evil way, I am talking about being judgmental in an ignorant way. And, what does that mean? Being judgmental in an ignorant way means that you judge something purely on the surface without any knowledge.
Let's take Obama for instance. Because he is Nubian like you and me, you judge him to be fair, honest, and good for all Nubians in America. The truth is, he is worse to us than any other white president before him. More Nubian people in America have suffered under his presidency than in the entire history of the country, including during slavery.
Two Churches
So what's the problem? The problem is that we do not think to gather information about someone, before making a judgment on them.
Two Churches
There were once two churches. One church was a Nubian Catholic church. One church was a Nubian Islamic. The leader of both churches were Nubian men. The buildings that both churches occupied were of the same size and had the same wealth.
Immediately, the population, around the churches, judged them equally to be bad.
They said, what Nubian man would form a Catholic church. The Catholics have enslaved Nubians since the dawn of time, they said. The Catholics pray to false idols and are unholy, they said.
Because of the propaganda in the media against Muslims and the Islamic religion, they said the same thing about the Islamic church formed by the Nubian leader. They said, they will incite terrorism in our community. They said, they'll form terror sleeper cells of our young men.
There was a third church that formed. It was started by another Nubian man, a holy man. This church was a Protestant church. All the population praised this church. They said, here is our church, started by a righteous Nubian brother, a church that never enslaved Nubians and one that will never form terrorists in our community.
The Nubian Catholic Church
Black Madonna and Christ Child
The Nubian Catholic church gathered the same amount of Nubian membership as did the other two churches. Surprisingly, there were many Nubian Catholics in the population.
Despite the insults and judgement hoisted on the church, it prospered. The church started programs to encourage entrepreneurship in the community and adopted all of the poor people in the community and mentored them our of poverty. The members that started businesses hired the poor people to work in their stores.
Still, the Nubian community still clung to their judgments and called the church evil and never recognized the good that it did for the community.
The Nubian Islamic Church
The Nubian Islamic church gathered the same amount of Nubian membership as did the other two churches. Surprisingly, there were many Nubian Muslims in the population.
Despite the insults and judgement hoisted on the church, it prospered. The church started programs to clean up the community of crime, violence and drugs. It made a clean sweep of the low income housing projects and encouraged all Nubians to get married and get off of government programs. It also encouraged many Nubians to get their law degrees and go into politics. It encouraged the Nubian politicians to set aside funding for Nubian businesses so they would have available capital. It encouraged Nubian lawyers to submit laws to stop the targeting of Nubians for incarceration and long mandatory sentences that only Nubians were sentenced to.
Still, the Nubian community still clung to their judgments and called the church evil and never recognized the good that it did for the community.
The Nubian Protestant Church
The Nubian Protestant church gathered the same amount of Nubian membership as did the other two churches. They did not have to even ask for members, since most Nubians were Protestant.
The Nubian leader started a prostitution ring inside the church. The members elected the elites of the church to a board, who gathered collections from the poorer members and pocketed themselves. The Nubian leader encouraged homosexuality in the young men of the church and over half of the board members partook of violating the young men in homosexual acts. The Nubian leader became a rich man, a millionaire, while the average member of his church made less than $40,000 a year, combined household income.
Still, the Nubian community still clung to their judgments and called the church great and never recognized the evil that it did in the community.
The Two Churches Have Had Enough
The two churches saw the evil that the Nubian Protestant church was doing. For years they hesitated in doing anything because the population clung to the image that a Nubian Protestant church must be a good thing.
The straw that broke the camel's back was when word came that a young girl had been raped by a board member. When the girl was brought to an emergency meeting with the Nubian leaders of the two churches, she brought friends. These friends were also young girls, and they brought friends. Their friends were young boys ages 6 - 12. The girls all said they had been raped and sworn to secrecy by the Nubian Protestant leader and the board members. The boys all said they had been convinced to be homosexual and engage in homosexual acts with board members, who were all middle-aged men or above. The boys said that they were told that it was a lifestyle and that when they watched T.V. it said the same thing, so they never came forward, although it had started almost immediately since the Nubian Protestant church had formed.
Instead of confronting the Nubian Protestant church's board members or its Nubian leader, the two churches went about it the smart way. All of the lawyers in the Nubian Islamic church gathered evidence and the testimony of all the children. They caused inspection upon inspection on the church. They had the financial records seized. All of the businessmen of the Nubian Catholic church called for land and title ownership to be reviewed, and all liens on the property to become due.
All members of the board and the Nubian leader were prosecuted and sentenced to over 40 counts of molestation, carnal knowledge with a minor and many financial charges, including prostitution.
The church property was seized and sold to the Nubian businessmen. The land was divided up, so that all of the businessmen would not be the target of any retaliation.
Even after all that came out, the population still said the Nubian Catholic church and the Nubian Islamic church were evil and that the Nubian Protestant church was good, and that they, the two churches, "did this" to the Nubian Protestant church, even some of the very parents of the children that were molested.
[The facts of this story are true. Names are not named to protect my safety and the safety of those in the story. The way in which the story is told, is verbatim of how it was told to me or found in print, you my research the facts yourself. No harm is intended to anyone of any faith, religion, creed, nor sexuality.]
[Fact: nearly 70% of the Nubian community in America are against homosexuality and see it as a direct threat to the Nubian community's continued existence in America. - LA Times Shelby Grad / Dr Umar Johnson]
[Fact: every endocrinologist interviewed stated they saw no DNA evidence, hormonal evidence nor any glandular evidence to suggest a difference between a homosexual individual and a "straight" individual, leading all of them to the conclusion that homosexuality has no natural or genetic cause, i.e. it is a choice. As such an overwhelming majority of Nubians feel homosexuality is a choice.]
[Fact: until the 70s homosexuality was on the medical books as a mental disorder. Most people diagnosed with the disorder who sought treatment were "cured" or in treatment. It was not until a group of gay activists lobbied to get the status changed and a person could NOT get treatment for it any longer, nor be cured of the fetish. - Dr Umar Johnson (clinical psychologist)]
The Top 5 Warning Signs You're Addicted to Shopping
Before you buy anything today, ask yourself: how often do i buy something each day, each week, each month?
If the answer is every day, several times a day, you might actually be addicted to spending money. If going to the store, seems like something "to do", you might be addicted to spending money. If the answer to "I'm bored" is going to a store, you might be addicted to spending money. If your daily routine includes shoping, simply as a part of your day, you might be addicted to spending money. If you say to yourself you must have the latest or something new every week or day, you might be addicted to spending money.
Addicted to Shopping
It's interesting to note that most poor people, spend the largest amount of their money. While the richer you are, the less portion of your income and wealth you spend.
Beware, the news, media and entertainment, put the image in front of you of people buying and having new things all the time.
Just 20 years ago, a MAJORITY of America ate at home. Now, it's the opposite. In fact, it is no longer considered "eating out", as in a special occasion.
Try to make yourself a little promise:
I won't buy anything new, including food, for a whole day
I won't buy anything new, including food, for a whole week
I won't buy anything new, including food, for a whole month.
See which one you can do. And if you can only do #1, see if you can stretch it to 2 days, 3 days, and keep going. You'll find a whole week will creep up on you. Now, of course this takes planning, meaning, you have to cook at home.
Last year, X Factor judge Kelly Rowland, 31, told reporters: ‘The desire to be in control and decide everything myself as much as possible gets in the way. The fact that I can act a little bossy has ruined quite a few dates.
‘I choose the restaurant, I open the door myself, sometimes I’ll even pay the bill. I need to learn to let a man be a gentleman. That must be one reason why I’m single.’
The inevitable consequence of the gender revolution and the 2nd wave of feminism [we're currently in the 3rd wave mind you] meant that women were told to be independent. The absurdity is that this independent movement, meant that lesser women did not understand the lesson at all, and thought it meant to be independent of men. But, then turned around and didn't understand that that meant being single too. And, they wonder why.
A lot of women today in their 30s and 40s take on the aspects of men, not the aspects of women. Being the boss, around men, means that men will treat you like another man, not like a potential spouse. It is a very glaring fact.
If you open your own doors, pay your own way and drive yourself to a date, then you are a business partner, not a lady. That is the perception.
You might as well wear pants and smoke cigars around him, and slap him on the back when he tells jokes, just be one of the guys. The fact that you have boobs matters little when you come across more like a trucker than a dainty dame.
Why it is So Hard to Let Go
The real problem is that most women, in the yuppie years, cannot be told that they are acting like the man. The very thing that makes them bossy, also clouds their vision when someone tells them that they are acting bossy.
Understandably, the set of skills it takes to get into middle management are the very same behaviors that render them single, being bossy. The real problem is the complete inability to recognize this.
The perfect woman would be a boss at work, and as soon as she set foot across her threshold, she would turn into a dainty dame that cooked her husband dinner and curled up next to him on the couch and fall asleep in his arms.
Lesser women cannot do this. Due to the American educational system, the media, the babying of the country, most people, men and women, only think in terms of A or B, this or that, black or white, 1 or 2. As adults, we are kept in an infant state of thinking, and cannot understand of our capability to be complex individuals with multiple sides and adjust to different people in different situations.
We have terribly juvenile sayings like, "you cannot be all things, to all people."
That saying is conditioning the person that tries to adhere to it, to mean, you should be hot or cold only. Such a person who listens to that advice could never conceive of being hot, cold, warm or even more incredibly, FUZZY. I mean, what exactly does fuzzy have to do with that list? And, that's exactly my point. In a world of hot or cold people, black or white people, type A or type B people, a person that comes along that is "fuzzy" would be looked at as if they were a complete alien. But, get this, to other fuzzy people, he or she, would be perfect.
You Jane, Me Tarzan
So how do you let men be Tarzan and you be Jane? It is easy. Be a lady around men.
Sure at work, you can be as bossy as ever. At work, you can tell your employees when to jump and how high, and if they don't do it, be as snippy as you want. It might not win you friends at work, but what do you care. [ I am being sarcastic if you did not understand. Don't be a jerk at work. ]
But, on a blind date, be a lady. And, for those that do not know what a lady is, as apparently it is complete lost on this generation, I have a list for you.
How to Be a Lady
The essence of being a lady and the most important thing that governs all other actions in your life is: "always look for a way to be kind and generous"
"learn to speak the best English, with perfect grammar" the rest of this entire list will be completely undone if you do not speak properly
this might trip up many modern women but it has to be said: "always wear a dress or skirt"
being a lady is about being modest about your body: "never wear anything that lets your knees show, nor wear anything that goes below your collar bone"
when sitting, keep the knees together, and they should never separate, even when crossing them or switching them to cross the other leg
this might sound more modern than old-fashioned, but it is actually quite old thinking: "always be organized"
"always be groomed, even at home, even first thing in the morning" it is a lot of work, but you're worth it
"always wear the best dress or skirt for the occasion" you don't wear a gown to a football match
"learn manners and always behave politely" this goes a long way in all aspects of life, including business
"always be kind and expect the very best in people" you cannot go around thinking everyone is going to use you or mistreat you, because a few people are criminals and have criminal minds, most people do not have criminal minds
"always carry a modest-sized purse with emergency nicknacks in it" things like hairpins, pencil, napkins, handkerchief, small notebook, and things you might need in a friendly emergency
"learn a crafting hobby like embroidery"
"learn to sing and play an instrument"
"learn to write with a pen beautifully"
"learn at least two classical dances" at very least waltz and tango
"keep a lean [not skinny] figure" walk for an hour every day
"learn to draw" this will not only help you appreciate art in general, but it sharpens your own mind so that if ever you're in a situation where you need to remember how someone looks, your mind will be trained to remember small details
your reputation is your most precious commodity "never visit a man's house after sundown" you know what I mean, it is a really bad scene and the neighbors will think far less of you if they see you entering a man's house after dark
"never visit a man's house you do not know personally even in the day time" the real story here is you should not visit a man's house that has not made it clear he intends to marry you, having "fun" is not lady-like, it is for common women
"never kiss a man [non-husband] in public and in private never kiss a man for more than 5 seconds" it takes a man no more than 5 seconds to become gender aroused, a lady does not have gender with strange men, nor with men who are not their husband, to do so means you are no longer a lady, to avoid this, you do not kiss a man in private for more than 5 seconds, if he cannot understand why you won't have gender with him, then either he's too dumb [which disqualifies him] or really has no intention of ever being with you as husband and wife [it's really just that simple] and you may come right out and tell him "I will not be with a man who is not my husband" remember it doesn't take years to get married
"never walk alone outside of your home, especially at night" no matter what you think you know, or what weapon you carry in your purse, and this applies to men THERE IS ALWAYS A BIGGER, STRONGER MAN THAT CAN TAKE YOU
"it is a good idea to share the first 3 dates with a friend, a la double-date" most date rapes happen between men and women that hardly know each other, a lady protects herself
"never ever have a 3rd glass, and never drink in front of a stranger or leave your glass alone" a lady is never intoxicated in public, and you must protect yourself at all times
"always have an escort to and from a party" strength in numbers is not only good protection, but is very classy
"never call anyone after 10pm and do not receive calls after 10pm" people will respect this immediately, even work
"always call someone back immediately or the next day, even if it is to say that you're sorry but you cannot do a certain thing" a lady is always polite first, even if it is to say no
"call and visit friends frequently" a lady thinks of others and this is quite contagious
"always show up with a small gift, never show up empty-handed" even if you're the guest of honor, bring something
"learn how to cook, above average" a lady knows her way around a kitchen, and is organized in it
"remember everything" birthdays, anniversaries, things mentioned around you for gifts, who's allergic to what food when you're having a dinner party
"never curse, nor say anything rude"
"always ignore people's faults"
"if someone falls, ask a man to help them up first, if no man is present, with knees together, bend down and offer your hand to help them up, while asking if they are hurt" always be thinking of the other persons feelings, never laugh at someone falling down, gravity is always with us
"protect children" this should be a no brainer
"always practice table manners" asked things to be be passed to you "please", no elbows on the table
"learn a small giggle" there is nothing more distasteful than loud laughter from a "lady" a small giggle will ingratiate you to everyone
"learn to giggle at men's jokes" there is nothing more endearing than a lady that giggles at a man's jokes, and a lady is always light-hearted anyway, so it should come naturally
"never let people see your open mouth" this sounds very strange, but it goes along with loud laughing, if they never see your open mouth, then you are not laughing loud or talking loud, a lady is always composed
"always write thank you notes, and by hand, for everything" you should keep a complete stack of personal envelopes and blank cards, at your home desk, for thank you notes for being invited to parties, gifts that you received, interviews, a lady is always thoughtful
"always send cards for every occasion, written by hand" this should go without saying, and this is on top of any gift you're going to give, everything comes with a card, and you send cards to distant acquaintances if you can
"remember to never gossip, never allow gossip to be spoken around you" a lady always thinks the best of people and ignoring people's faults goes right along with this, and a lady stamps out rumors from even being spoken around her, if all else fails, excuse yourself from the room, or even if you must, leave the house, it is just that crucial. people will get the picture almost immediately, that they cannot gossip around you.
"visit people" not just friends for friendship, but when they are in the hospital, pregnant, sick, and try to bring something with you, they will always be glad to see you
"always wear a hat outside" this might seem really old-fashioned, but protecting your skin is as practical as a matching hat, but it also sets you apart if you're in a dress and hat at all times
"always wear shades" in beaming summer sun it protects your eyes, in the winter, wear very light colored shades to protect your eyes, again it sets you apart
"always wear light make-up" even at home you should wear some light make-up so that you look your best at all times, you never know when you might get a phone call to visit a friend in the emergency room
"people come first" this is the mantra of a lady, other people come first, you cannot go wrong with it. don't be stupid about it, but do not dismiss people like undignified people do
If you print this and start practicing it, you will find within a week, everyone around you will change.
Looking over the list, you might think that it is hard and a lot of work. But, frankly, it is a mindset and not nearly as complicated as it seems. Being in the right frame of mind is the part that kick-starts you into being a lady. The essence of it, is simply being polite and modest.
It is fine to be a 3rd degree black belt, but keeping that knowledge to yourself, is the mark of a lady. [and gentleman actually] This is where many women falter. They feel they have to show off that they know something. The only person you should share your knowledge and secrets with, is your husband. You can hide behind your napkin. Also when you are in an intimate setting with your husband, you can behave differently, and let him see your secret thoughts and share your past with him.
Being a lady at home and in public, while knowing your secrets is what really bonds your husband to you, and you to him.
The inside joke, is the bond between you. The more inside jokes you have with your husband the stronger the relationship.
Can You Behave Like a Lady and Get Married
Looking over the lady list, a lot of women may ask, can I do all this or not do "normal" things every-day women do, yet still get married. In particular, can you not have gender with a man and he still asks you to marry him. Yes.
You do not have to have genderwith a man, to get him to marry you.
It is just that simple.
You can be a lady around a man, and it will make him more apt to ask your hand in marriage, than if you slept with him.
Conclusion
Women are finding that being bossy and picky at work is bleeding over into their personal lives and are ending up alone for life. Change from being a bossy, picky, snide woman into being a lady. A lady is far more apt to get asked to be married.
I would venture to say, that being a lady at work will get you ahead far more than being one of the guys too. Men have an almost instinctive reaction to women that act like ladies, i.e. doing things for them without thinking. I would think it would be very hard not to be promoted as a well organized lady at work, compared to being a bossy snot. Sure, you both get the job done, but you, as a lady, get it done while everyone around you enjoys your company.
Turn on any "supposedly" right wing talk show, radio show, or podcast and you will hear the announcer refer to a democrat as a liberal. LIBERAL LIBERAL LIBERAL! This weird mantra is repeated over and over. Why? For most people, on paper Democrats seem to be the defenders of the weak, and hence the darlings of those bleeding hearts out there that just want to touch everyone they can, with their good feelings. However, nothing could be further from the truth. I am sorry to tell you.
Democrats are not "liberals".
Democrats and Republicans are
socialists, collectivists and globalists
In fact, I am sorry to tell you, Democrats and Republicans are both socialists, collectivists and globalists.
You cannot find a single Democrat or Republican that is an actual "liberal".
Sorry for your own mis-education, but most of you reading this will not even know the definition of Liberal.
Let's go right to the definition: favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers. So right at the start, you can see that Democrats, and Republicans for that matter, do not fall into this definition.
The founding fathers, as we are taught in school, were all "liberal". The country was founded on the notion that the government was not to play a role in your everyday life and for the most part you could live your entire life without ever having to come in contact with a government employee. The nation was set-up so that interaction between citizens were kept so private, as to be deemed the most sacred of our policies.
However, left to their own devices, humans will prosper over time. Those who wanted more power and wealth, wanted to gather that prosperity and collect it into the hands of only a few people. The quickest and easiest way to do this was through public policy. But, to do this, the U.S. government had to grow drastically. So they set out to do just that.
Today the government is so large and invades your privacy so much, that only a hermit would ever have the opportunity to not come in contact with a government employee. Through more and more public policy the government increased in size and now touches upon aspects of your life, the founding fathers would never have dreamed possible. In fact, the U.S. government invades the privacy of its citizens so much, that even the very tyrannical king of England, whom we supposedly fought to get away from, never touched upon our privacy in such a way.
The people that fought against the king of England were all considered liberals, fighting for the freedom of all people to not be invaded by its government. Yet today we have debates over whether a woman has a right to kill her unborn child. Today we have debates over whether two men can engage in a religious marriage ceremony. Today the local governments perform religious ceremonies. Today local governments tax people to get married. Today the government tells a parent where they can and cannot send their children. Today the government taxes those who want to send their children to school. Today the government runs schools. Today the government taxes you for owning property, purchasing property and constantly charge your for keeping property.
These are all unheard of things, in the mind of a colonial revolutionary liberal.
It is common, among the American public, for the average everyday citizen to NOT educate themselves, nor double-check the facts that they hear on the news, magazines, television, internet. Most Americans struggle with jobs and working for other people, for a single source of income, to be bothered with doing anything extra to make sure they are making the right decisions day in and day out. They are shown this by their parents, generation after generation, that you simply turn on a television and accept everything that they say as factual. They are shown this by their parents, generation after generation, that you simply go to a church and accept everything the minister says, and the book he goes by, as factual, and even worse, unquestionable.
Paul Robin Krugman is an American economist, Professor of Economics and International Affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, Centenary Professor at the London School of Economics, and an op-ed columnist for The New York Times
It saddens me then, when someone who is older than me, and perceives himself to be learned, that he thinks to argue something he has never studied, researched, nor took the time to dissect and fit all the pieces together to see the sinister undertones. Case in point, one such discussion occurred when a picture was presented showing the insanity of how the tremendous debt the federal government has, and the state of the economy, can be fixed by going into more debt. This fool, and I mean the term in the technical sense, proceeded to defend and argue that going into debt had nothing to do with the state of the economy and even if it did, it did not make the situation worse. He tried to defend the statement that Paul Krugman made saying, "debt killing the economy? More debt will fix that."
The house and senate create the annual spending budget for things like: military; research; welfare and its ilk; social security and its ilk; wars and 3rd party contractors; national state programs which it promptly defunds after a year or two.
They take in taxes.... wait, we'll get to the taxes last.
They are sorely underfunded for all of their concerns, to the tune of trillions of dollars. The private monopoly banks, known as the federal reserve system, LENDS them money AT INTEREST, instead of congress simply printing its own money, selling bonds, or raising capital WITHOUT INTEREST. This creates debt. This debt is created annually, to the tune of MORE interest than taxes ALONE can cover.
The taxes that the federal government then collects, goes only to pay off a PORTION of the interest it owes to the private consortium, known as the federal reserve Bank system. And why wouldn't they do this, because the population is none the wiser, because there is absolutely NO accounting for what the private bank does. All we see is a price tag, AND ITS PAID. And, they play a smoke and mirrors game to say "taxes cover everything" wink wink nudge nudge, "so we must raise taxes, because the budget has gone up". OR EVEN WORSE, "we are balancing the budget, so we must raise taxes to help *balance* it", muahahahahaha we're sneaky.
So, getting back to the original premise, that debt is horrible, let's raise the debt... either you don't know the above system exists, because if you do, then you would have to be a more sinister than the federal reserve private banks itself. You seem smart, so i'll just call you The Dastardly Mr. Beasley.
Politics is smoke and mirrors. Now you see the budget, now you don't. Voila! Presto chango, we spend trillions and no one accounts for where it comes from.
Obama the Darling of Wallstreet
I saw a video of Tony Robins, of all people... it has to be serious, for him to make an economy video, where he talks about taking everyone's money, all the "rich" people in america, sports players, movie producers, wall street moguls, corporations, oil companies and he goes down the list. And, he covers day by day of taking all of their money, not just taxes. And, when the calculation is done it still does not cover al 52 weeks, it falls short of two weeks in one year. But then, he concludes that the next year, NONE of the budget would be covered, because now you have seized all of the rich people's money. It's a very graphic example of how out of whack the debt is.
Many learned people have said, by congress simply coining its own money for 5 years, the entire debt of the US would be wiped out.5 years, that's one presidency.
No thinking man, knowing both the current system, and knowing that the debt could be wiped out, would agree that debt is bad nor would say it has NOTHING to do with the current economic DEPRESSION [ a word the government refuses to admit, despite all indicators that this is WORSE than the great depression ] [ oh and everyone is doing their part to hide the fact:
- shadow inventory of housing
- hiding true unemployment rates
- hiding business failures
- hiding stock manipulation
- hiding the real value of the USD
- hiding the 70% wealth lose across the board for all racial groups, in America
- not even acknowledging the 35% unemployment rate amongst Blacks
- hiding the Black incarceration epidemic amongst Blacks [which has single-handedly led to a 90% drop in Black wealth]
- hiding the failures of fannie and freddie
- hiding the debt owed to foreign banks
- hiding the payments going to foreign banks
- hiding the real money down a hole, going to wall street corporations [ we're talking, watchdog groups are saying 10s of trillions have already been spent, and more is being spent secretly] the real reason the federal reserve does not wish to be "audited".
• The typical American household would have paid nearly all of its income in taxes last year to balance the budget if the government used standard accounting rules to compute the deficit, a USA TODAY analysis finds
• Under those accounting practices, the government ran red ink last year equal to $42,054 per household — nearly four times the official number reported under unique rules set by Congress
• A U.S. household's median income is $49,445, the Census reports
• The big difference between the official deficit and standard accounting: Congress exempts itself from including the cost of promised retirement benefits
• Yet companies, states and local governments must include retirement commitments in financial statements, as required by federal law and private boards that set accounting rules
• The deficit was $5 trillion last year under those rules
• The official number was $1.3 trillion
• Liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and other retirement programs rose by $3.7 trillion in 2011, according to government actuaries, but the amount was not registered on the government's books
• The federal government calculates the deficit in a way that makes the number smaller than if standard accounting rules were followed (in trillions)
• Social Security had the biggest financial slide
• The government would need $22.2 trillion today, set aside and earning interest, to cover benefits promised to current workers and retirees beyond what taxes will cover
• That's $9.5 trillion more than was needed in 2004
• Deficits from 2004 to 2011 would be six times the official total of $5.6 trillion reported
• Federal debt and retiree commitments equal $561,254 per household
• By contrast, an average household owes a combined $116,057 for mortgages, car loans and other debts
• "By law, the federal government can't tell the truth," says accountant Sheila Weinberg of the Chicago-based
The big difference between the official deficit and standard accounting: Congress exempts itself from including cost of retirement perks.
Conclusion
So in essence, until we can get the government to use real math, real numbers, reveal the true hurt that is going on, we cannot even start to have a dialogue of how to fix it. For example, if we base a set policy to fix $1 trillion of debt, but then we find at the end of the fix that it was actually $16 trillion, we almost did absolutely nothing with the fix.
And that is the problem with the Obama presidency in a nutshell. He constantly says how he is saving us money, or lowering our taxes. But, the problem is he's raising it in other areas far higher than it ever was to begin with.
We see this over and over in all of his policies. He promised to remove the troops from the "wars". But, he actually doubled and tripled the troops in Afghanistan. I'm not going to say he is lying, but it's a lie.
