While politics is a low down, dirty business, there was a time when politicians and major news outlets behaved with dignity, respect and diplomacy. We all knew the politicians did not like each other, but they would never stoop to using common language, that common people on the street would use, to express their disdain for each other, nor create an atmosphere pregnant with the most base street environment, where you would fear for your very existence, at expressing your difference.
But, here we are today. In their lust for power and to appeal to the masses and the lowest common denominator, and to get the most basic, uneducated voter to even understand what is going on, politicians now use street language and the news parrots it, to get the most base man and woman to side with them.
Hey they talk like me. I suddenly understand everything they say. Or, at least that's what the democrats think the most crass of the public says to themselves.
They also have cultivated tribalism, us vs them, to the extreme. No longer can the voter, potentially deviate in voting for different candidates based on the merits of the topics, they must be made to utterly despise all other political parties, no matter the cost. Even to the point where the other candidate might be proposing the best solution to the problems facing the nation, they must be made to vote against their own self interest, because they are the enemy.
As democrats keep using base, crass language, and employing tribalism as a political strategy, they keep going down this path of not only hating all opposition, but also promoting the idea that all other political thought hates them.
This creates a tense environment where you end up with liberal groups showing up to political speeches to beat up the audience, calling the listeners all sorts of crazy names. Because, that's what the democrats and the news media says they are.
An audience has come to attend a speech, and instead they are presented with, not protesters, but an insane mob, out for a physical showdown. It's not a matter how did we get here. We all know how we got here. But, I will answer the question, no one wants to know. Why are democrats so disgusting now?
During the lead up to the 2nd term of President Barack Obama, the democratic party was poised to be dissolved. Not only was Obama not going to make his 2nd term, but democrats weren't going to be a party any longer.
Various groups had formed which attracted people away from the democratic party, and they were fleeing like rats from a sinking ship. It got to a point where there were desperate cries from the main stream media, to stop the hemorrhaging. If the demoratic party failed, so did the main stream media, because, they might actually have to report the real news, without a democratic bend to all of their stories.
Obama presented the only strategy they had, to rally the Black vote. With the Black superstars going full hog on the Black vote, others fell in line. If Blacks were still going to vote democrat, surely I'll vote with them. And so the entire party was saved by a voting block that the democrats have never paid attention to, a voting block that democrats have paid nothing more than lip service to.
Imagine their horror, when Trump won the nomination of the republican party. Trump was an icon in the Black community. He was a boss. He was rich. He took no prisoners and he promoted Black people over the years. He was the coolest rich guy they knew and he donated to Black causes from time to time, winning him awards from Black political, social and religious groups over the years.
Democrats went into overdrive. They made sure to smear him, to the very Black people that admired him. And, it would have worked, if it weren't for the fact that when he first said he was running, a ton of Black rappers made Trump raps for him. No one expected him to win, so making rap songs about him, was brushed under the rug.
Those rap songs came back to bite the democrats late in the presidential campaign. Because their smear tactics kinda failed, when there were recent rap songs singing his praises and saying how awesome he was. Also remember, he was a democrat, right up until the moment he announced for the republican party.
So, for Black rappers, he was still a rich, no holds barred, democrat.
He got millions of Blacks to vote for him, mostly Black men. The female strategy of the democrats still worked on Black women.
As democrats went into overdrive denouncing and smearing Trump, more and more Black men have seen the democrats for what they are. Very slowly, Black women are too.
And so, as the Blacks leave the sinking ship of the democratic party, so too do others.
Democrats aren't dumb. They see the writing on the wall. But, unfortunately, that has made them even more desperate. They have gone into full beast mode, smearing people left and right, full tribalism and full of very bad, rude and disrespectful language in their mouth.
When you call someone a sellout, the listener normally closes his ears and runs screaming, because in this politically correct world, making someone responsible for their words and actions is actually frowned upon. I want you to put on your big boy pants. I want you to put on your big girl panties. I want you to lift your chin up and understand that, if someone lays all their cards on the table and 90% of them backstab the very people that they "say" they are trying to help, that guy is a sellout.
You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're cursing them. You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're making them have abortions. You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're turning them against the people that make them wealthy. You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're teaching them to hate the very people that are fighting for their freedom. You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're putting them in the back of the bus, or under it. You cannot constantly say you're helping Black folk, and all the while you're keeping racism and bigotry alive and kicking.
These people below have done all of this. Search each statement. Keep your big boy pants on, and open your eyes and SEE what is going on around you, and TO you.
Talk to any Obama kool-aid drinking bobble head and you get this: "There would be a lot more jobs for a lot of people of all colors if the Congress- the Tea Party Obstructionist Congress- would allow the Obama job programs to be implemented. "Gaining ground under Bush"? Kidding, right? What statistics a
re you using? The only new jobs during Bush were at McDonalds."
The very things you're saying, condemn your own points. Let's go over them shall we?
Obama elected 2008
democrat house / democrat senate: nothing was passed
republican house gained majority 2010
all negotiations with republicans were hampered by obama, who was going further than any republican in stripping medicare and other darling democrat programs
economy and DOW took a steep plunge as soon as Obama took office
Obama's job bill was to hire census workers
McDonalds was the only major employer hiring during OBAMA's administration not Bush
all census workers fired, plunging unemployment numbers to record highs
Obama takes office and TRIPLES THE IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN TROOP DEPLOYMENT
after mid-term elections were over and Obama had not removed the troops like he promised and everyone wanted, culminating in a republican house, Obama finally caved in and promised one more year until troops were to be returned home, and, that was only after democrats came to him telling him that they would not win the house, nor the presidency if the troops were not removed by next election
I'm an investor, you see. I run several blogs, one namely being about investing. Investors do not listen to rhetoric, we pay attention to numbers, facts, legislation.
Black wealth has been DECIMATED under Obama. And, I don't think it's so funny people laughing about it, or cavalierly saying Bush was worse for Black people. There is NO comparison.
PEW RESEARCH: Black Wealth Gap Widens
- 2005 net worth $12,124 [ net worth is calculated by taking all your assets, paying off all debts, and the remainder is the net worth]
- 2009 net worth $5,677
The gap has widened by a factor of 10 between Blacks and whites, under Obama.
In fact, Blacks were super wealthy after slavery, compared to today. [pretty shocking]
But wait, even if you're not Black, or don't care, or the stat doesn't move you, MAYBE THIS WILL
Fraction of growth captured by top 1%
Bush: 2002-2007 65%
Obama: 2009-2010 93%
Yes under Bush the top 1% got 65 cents out of every dollar. But, under Obama they got 93 cents out of every dollar.
All this "hate the rich" fanfair is completely stupid.
All this "the poor are angels" is equally stupid.
The so called rich create ALL the jobs.
The obama taxes hit people who create jobs and wind up causing them to have to fire half of their staff.
There is no VIRTUE to being poor.
A lot of people are poor BECAUSE of taxes, directly AND indirectly.
How? all the taxes add up to lower pay if they raise them on you AND - higher taxes means that employers get rid of people because of taxes. you lose your job, while living paycheck to paycheck ... HELLO POVERTY.
The enemy is taxes and socialism, NOT the rich.
A rich person, by being rich, has NEVER made you poor or even taken money from you, nor affected you in any way, BUT TAXES HAVE.
Those very jobs you complained about going overseas, IS BECAUSE OF SUBSIDIES PAID BY OBAMA TO SHIP JOBS OVERSEAS. put the blame where it belongs. half of you people must be drinking the cool aid of main stream news. we are paying tax money TO THE COMPANY to ship the jobs overseas.
Finally, if you've gotten this far in reading my comment, then the final truth is that 90% of these taxes are UNNECESSARY, they keep a giant government, bloated beyond the scope of what it should be in the first place. who would you rather take care of the poor, you and your church, or some government agency that makes that same family of mom, dad, child get divorced, prove they are poor, move them out of their family home of 3 generations, prove they have no funds in their bank account, including funds for junior's college education, and THEN give them $300 / month.
Instead of paying taxes, local groups, organizations and individuals would do a much better job of taking care of the poor, homeless, elderly, single moms, families falling on hard times, than any government agency.
Instead of paying taxes TO HAVE JOBS SHIPPED overseas, "in the interest of free trade" yes this is what they claim it is for, we could completely eliminate those taxes form ever being taken in the first place and stop giving it to companies.
Instead of collecting huge amounts, yes millions, from individual people, we could cut all the social programs AND programs that actual hurt the american family AND remove the loop holes. I guarantee you the rich would love it.
50% of the population is either exempt on taxes, or gets a full refund at tax season. that means they pay no taxes, because they are poor enough not to have to pay. that means if you actually are in the top 50% you can afford to pay taxes. any sane person would then go to their accountant and tax lawyer and make sure to pay the least amount of taxes.
There is nothing virtuous about paying for a government, that doesn't represent you, does not care about you, tries their best to take as much money from you, JUST BECAUSE.
Instead of defending the government and fighting about who should pay MORE taxes, you should be fighting for everyone to pay less and less and less taxes, every year.
I have been wracking my brain thinking about how american life has changed over the past 40 years. We did not have the super rich 40 years ago. Yes, we might have had a bevvy of millionaires, but we did not have billionaires running around one per city. In my musings I knew there had to be a fundamental shift in how the average person was behaving that made the super rich. Finally it dawned on me. Although most Americans complain about the super rich, or the 1%, they pay them money at every opportunity they can, under the guise of entertainment.
Occupy Wallstreet Protesters Being Paid to Protest
Filmed Entertainment will grow from $36.8 billion in 2011 to $45.7 billion in 2015.
Video-on-demand spending will pass pay-per-view in 2011 and reach $4.7 billion in 2015, a 9.8% compound annual increase from $2.9 billion in 2010.
From 2011-2015, aggregate Entertainment and Media global spending will rise to $1.9 trillion in 2015, a 5.7% compound annual advance driven by economic growth.
That's just a SMALL tip of the tip of the iceberg. Bars, alcohol and what you do on your "weekend" is an even more staggering number. The reality is that we are now paying for luxury items as normal items, and somehow think that the luxury item is the basic item. We buy luxury food, thinking it is basic food. We buy luxury cars, thinking they are basic cars. We put luxury components in our luxury items, thinking that we need the luxury and not the true basic. We also shop, eat and bank at luxury shops.
Case in point, the Occupy Wallstreet "movement".
THE ENTIRE OCCUPY WALL STREET KERFUFFLE IS A FRAUD. You're all liars and hypocrites. I guarantee everyone in the occupy movement has an account at: Bank of America; Wells Fargo; Chase; Citibank; JP Morgan; USBank etc etc etc. I bet they all have a VISA / MASTERCARD. They are not only a lie, but a damn lie.
I bet they all go boozing on the weekends, eat at fast food, rent movies during the week or order pizza.
You want to make a real statement: go home; take a damn shower; remove your money from super corporations - even if they offer more convenient service; buy local; buy local; buy local. AND STOP SPENDING YOUR MONEY ON HAIR, NAILS, PIZZA AND JUNK YOU DON'T NEED.
The very thing you say you're against is the very thing you are supporting financially. You scream about corporations, but go buy Burger King. I bet none of them are driving a Hyundai Accent, Kia Rio, or Chevy Aveo, the cheapest cars in the land. How many of them are buying eggs, rice, bacon, beef and veggies, and cooking home cooked meals? How many of them read a book or sit by the radio for entertainment? How many of them sew their own clothes?
[ I actually cook from scratch and barely have internet as my only source of entertainment. I buy raw ingredients when shopping, and hardly ever clothes shop. I can actually sew. ]
You ruined America, they didn't. YOU DID IT. You made Bank of America. You made Wells Fargo.
[SHARE THIS MESSAGE, I WANNA SEE WHO WILL DO IT, AND IS NOT A HYPOCRITE]
UPDATE:
It has come to my attention, with proof, that the protesters are actually being paid to protest and to siphon off Tea Party members. They spent over a million to pay these people for this "movement".
For those who don't know, the tea party movement was started and has an original beginning date, staged by THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY. They flew a hot air balloon over boston, in a symbolic gesture and nod to the original tea party.
It was the brain child of the same guy that marketed the Ron Paul ReLOVEution, who is one of the Libertarian Party leaders.
It was co-opted by the Republican party, because the mainstream parties will never allow such a large grass roots movement to spring up around them, potentially ousting them.
Occupy Wall Street is 99% White
What's pathetic is that people do not know this and think the tea party is / was / and will be a republican thing.
To have Sarah F*ing Palin on a tea party stage is a slap in the face of america.
Now on to this occupy wall street. The democratic party, not to be outdone by the republican party stealing a movement, is now stealing the occupy movement. However, in true democrat fashion, it is repleat with the same racists, fascists that were in the democrat party in the 40s 50s and 60s. They have planted their key people into the movement and totally strangulated any and every possibility of it ever being a legitimate movement, right down to the part where the "occupiers" cause so much ruckus that they get AVERAGE AMERICANS fired from their jobs.
Some businesses are having to close because the holier than thou protesters are ruining their business and driving away customers. These are businesses run by EVERYDAY AMERICANS, not wall street bankers.
I guarantee these same smug bastards are withdrawing cash from their Bank of America ATM.
I guarantee none of them have come up with the bright idea to have their group remove their money from major banks and put them into credit unions, OR EVEN BETTER, START THEIR OWN CREDIT UNION.
Now we have union reps in the sit in to bring legitimacy to the cause.
Occupy Wall Street is 99% Hippies
And calling this a sit in, is a slap in the face of every Black person across the nation. This is not a cause about a group of people oppressing, degrading, raping, murdering, hanging, slandering, and passing laws for another group to completely not be able to participate in society. This entire charade could have been done easily by organizers removing themselves and their money from corporate control. In fact, they don't even need laws to be passed for their cause to win.
The sheer stupidity of this movement is obvious when one of their new "planks" is that government needs to pass laws to REGULATE BUSINESS MORE. Seriously? They are brain dead.
We Already Have Appointed a Woman, What More Do You Want?
Professor Elizabeth Warren
I have to admit truth to truth, Elizabeth Warren would set the consumer raping industry [banks] on its ear, were she appointed as Chair of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, IF AND ONLY IF, she actually had any power in the position. As it stands now, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is under the thumb of the Federal Reserve, which is like putting the fox in charge of the chickens. Give it 6 months and there will be no Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to speak of. It's already starting to happen as we speak.
Enter Robert Gibbs, White House spokesman, on Elizabeth Warren's potential to be a candidate: "I don't think any criticism, in any way, by anybody would disqualify her." Yet Obama has not nominated her at all. Gee I wonder why this is? Could it be the very people, whom he stole money from taxpayers, to bail out, would have a cow? The powers that be are showing their muscle by Obama not appointing Elizabeth Warren to the position.
According to the National Journal, the banking industry "privately grumbles that Warren would be their least favorite candidate to head the agency." Or, as Floyd Norris put it in the New York Times, "whether or not she is named to run the bureau may depend on how willing the president is to anger the banks."
Warren is one of the best people for the position. Picking her is a no-brainer. Rarely does a president have the opportunity for such a plethora of best people for the job, when it comes to appointing someone to a position. This position, at this time, being filled by Elizabeth Warren is one of those rare opportunities. Change huh?
Not only is she one of the country's foremost experts on bankruptcy law and the multiple ways in which banks trick and trap consumers, she's been the leading advocate for the creation of the agency, which the banking industry worked night and day to kill. In fact, it was Warren who came up with the idea for the agency in the first place, in a paper she wrote in 2007.
Senators and Congressmen alike are lining up to laud Warren as the best possible choice:
Sen. Al Franken: "In my consideration, I think Elizabeth would be the best."
Rep. Barney Frank (chair of the House committee that drafted the financial reform bill): "She's far and away the best candidate."
Sen. Bernie Sanders: "No one in our nation could do a better job."
Rep. Rosa DeLauro: "In my living room with many members of congress, she predicted what was going to happen several years ago. As she put it in 2007, consumers cannot buy a toaster that has a one in five chance of bursting into flames but they can enter into a mortgage that has the same one in five chance of putting them out onto the street...Professor Warren we cannot, Ma'am, do it without you."
Sen. Jeff Merkley: "I support Elizabeth Warren...She has both the clarity of the need for an agency that has as its top mission protecting citizens against tricks, traps and scams, and she has the ability to articulate that vision. She has the leadership skills and the knowledge of the financial world. She has the full set of requirements to be an effective leader."
Sen. Tom Udall: "Should [the president] decide to nominate her to lead the Bureau, it will be a clear sign that the Bureau will be a champion for the American consumer, will stand up to unscrupulous actors and will not shrink from...fulfilling its mission under pressure."
Secretary Tim Geithner:
She is an enormously effective advocate for reform. Probably the most effective advocate for consumer protection in the country. She has huge credibility and she played a decisive role in helping make the public case for reform and she was early on this, way ahead of everybody else. - Sunday on ABC's This Week
If you know about Goldman Sachs Geithner you know why he has stopped short of endorsing Warren (and, indeed, privately argued against her)?
Critics like Senetor Chris Dodd told NPR's Diane Rehm:
"The question is, 'is she confirmable?' And there's a serious question about it." And today he challenged Robert Gibbs' assertion that Warren is "very confirmable": "How does he know that?"
With mid-term elections on our doorstep, it's rather easy to be bold:
"Are the Republicans, when we bring her name up, going to argue that she shouldn't be confirmed because she's too tough on the big banks and too tough on the financial industry?" asked Senetor Tom Harkin. "Boy, that'll get them a lot of votes in November!"
Unfortunately there is a provision in the financial reform bill the president signed into law last week that allows the Treasury Secretary to name someone to head the Consumer Bureau until the Senate confirms a presidential nominee. There is no way Goldman Sachs Geithner will appoint Warren in the interim.
"The statute gives the Treasury Secretary the obligation to get it done, but doesn't tell him how to get it done," says Gail Hillebrand of the Consumers Union. "Consumers have been waiting a long time. The sooner we can get it off the ground the better."
Media outlets would have you think this is a Republican Democrat thing, however if you've been paying attention to this blog, you know it isn't. The democrats are no more beholden to the banks than the Republicans are. They are all bought and paid for.
Elizabeth Warren vs Tim Geithner
Opposition marketing spin currently being test-marketed is that because Warren is such a zealous advocate for consumers she would somehow be bad for "innovation." The same innovation that brought us credit default swaps, teaser rates, 600 percent payday loan rates, and that led to widespread foreclosures and bankruptcies. This line of reasoning is akin to saying that we don't want our police force to be very vigilant, lest it diminish criminal innovation. Warren herself addressed this ludicrous claim in a paper in 2008:
Innovation in financial products has produced incomprehensible terms and sharp practices that have left families at the mercy of those who write the contracts. This is exactly why the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created in the first place. If someone with Warren's skill set and perspective isn't named to head it, why even bother creating it? Just so another banking industry shill has a place to cool his heels before adding a few zeros to his salary when he quits and joins the companies he was ostensibly regulating? Given that this is the usual M.O. of how regulatory agencies in Washington work, it's all the more important to name Warren so she can start the Consumer Bureau off on the right foot -- as a true voice for the people.
So which way will Obama go? If he makes his decision on the merits, Elizabeth Warren will be the first head of the Consumer Bureau. If he makes his decision out of fear, she won't be. For guidance, he should listen carefully to his own words:
All too often -- our government made decisions based upon fear rather than foresight, and all too often trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions. Instead of strategically applying our power and our principles, we too often set those principles aside as luxuries that we could no longer afford. And in this season of fear, too many of us -- Democrats and Republicans; politicians, journalists and citizens -- fell silent... if we continue to make decisions from within a climate of fear, we will make more mistakes.
That was Barack Obama in May of last year, talking about the Bush administration's approach to national security in the wake of 9/11. As he finds himself in a different kind of "season of fear," will he use his insights as a guide to his decision?
Trying to Tear Down States Rights Over Federal Cowardice
Gov. Jan Brewer
While the country is going to hell in a handbasket, so many news organizations are steadily heaping logs onto the fire. Instead of them actually reporting factual news, they instead "report" a bunch of drama surrounding the news. This sells papers and advertisement, and makes EVERYONE dumber than they were 2 minutes before reading the stories. This is exactly the case surrounding the Arizona immigration law controversy. Instead of them reporting that the 9th circuit court of appeals refuses to listen to the case, because THERE IS NO CASE, they instead tell you they refuse to "get into the controversy". They even quote democrats, versus a republican governor, who says that the law is "laughable." What's laughable is that the federal government is trying to trump a state's right to protect itself, its economy and its citizens from unchecked illegal immigration that is destroying the state from the inside. They don't report how these illegal immigrants are not the supposed hard working salt of the earth people seeking a better life, but a bunch of gang-bangers, underage prostitution runners, human traffickers, who are all murdering people, burning people's homes and shutting down entire infrastructures.
Let me report the news as it should have been reported. No emotions, no drama, no scandal, I'll give you just the boring facts.
The facts are the Obama administration has very powerful friends that want virtual slave labor in the country. They only see the illegal immigrants as potential second class citizens they can use and abuse. They don't care that these illegals are not the hard working folks everyone tries to portray them as in the media. In fact only 1 in 7 is that hard working. Quite a few get on the government dole as soon as they cross the border and are a drain on the economy. But these big people don't care, they would prefer to just get millions and millions in so that 1 in 7 can be millions, regardless of the other 6 in 7.
In steps Arizona, a border state, that cannot take it any more. Murder, prostitution, drugs, arson, chaos, anarchy, is enough to get anyone's attention. The public outcry by border towns could not be ignored any longer. So the legislators and Governor Jan Brewer stepped in with applying the constitution to their state.
Actual La Raza Poster
Unlike those who don't understand, the federal government is NOT the supreme law of the land. States have equal power to the federal government and has always had equal power. In fact, time and again the supreme court has bowed to a state's right to regulate itself, over wishes by the federal government. Only in egregious instances of state abusing citizens has the courts allowed the federal government to step in on the citizen's behalf, i.e. Blacks being lynched, genital mutilation and jim crow. But, this is not that instance. The protection of the constitution does not blanket non-citizens, to begin with, and the citizens that ARE being abused are the citizens of the state and not the illegal immigrants.
However, what you see in the press is emotional pictures of old women crying, supposedly opposing the law. These marches and protests are organized by people who have an agenda that you will never hear about in the news. What is this agenda? Pure and simple, racism. These groups want Mexicans to come to the U.S. unchecked, without stipulation, without any litmus tests whatsoever. They want to transplant, if they can, the entire Mexican country inside the U.S. And, why is this? for political gain and power. They have already started, by getting legislation passed in many other states that would tie the hands of all law enforcement agencies, including the federal government, from determining immigration status, checking citizenship I.D. for gaining benefits, voting.
The Arizona legislation was a tremendous blow to this racist agenda of unchecked illegal Mexican immigration. However, these immigrants destroyed the very thing that they came here for, the economies of many border towns. Whole school districts had to close due to lack of funding and tax payer input. Hospitals had to shut down due to non-payment by illegal immigrants getting services and not paying for them, by the hundreds of thousands. Clinics had to shut down due to lack of funding. Civic infrastructure had to shut down. When 40% of the population is paying for the entire infrastructure of businesses and state benefits, they will shut down and go out of business. The load is too much for such a small paying population to bear.
La Raza Protest March
The crimes go unreported in the national media surrounding illegal immigrants. If they do, they are immediately called bigots and racist for reporting it. If police dedicate themselves to busting illegal immigrant gangs that have contracts to kill-on-sight Black people [real story] they are called racist cops for targeting latinos. If a cop pull over a criminal, with no insurance to cover the cost of him destroying a city bus with his car, and asks for immigration status, he's called a racist.
The agenda of these racist organizations to allow illegal immigration into the country, unchecked, is completely out of hand. It has hampered many many state and local authorities right to protect their own citizens.
Getting back the Obama administration. Unless you've been under a rock for the past century, the presidency is not a controlling position in the U.S. It is controlled by very powerful lobbies and business interests. The fallout of competing interests were made readily apparent, to anyone with a brain, in the George W. Bush elections 2000 and 2004. The veil was pulled aside, briefly, so that everyone could see the man behind the curtain. So as mentioned earlier these powers allow these racist organizations to thrive and continue unabated with their vile agenda. It [the organizations] serves their [the powers that be] purpose nicely.
Enter the courts. U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked the law by imposing an injunction for it going forward.
"Basically we believe (the law) is constitutional but she obviously pointed out faults that can possibly be fixed, and that's what we would do," Brewer told The Associated Press.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton
In her temporary injunction Wednesday, Bolton delayed the most contentious provisions of the law, including a section that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. Bolton indicated the federal government's case has a good chance at succeeding in its argument that federal immigration law trumps state law. Brewer has said she'll challenge the decision all the way to the Supreme Court.
Let's hope Governor Brewer does not cave into pressures from lobbies that have no public interest at heart. This law is about safety and the constitutionality of a state's right to protect itself, for citizens to be safe and secure in their homes. The press trying to convert this into an emotional issue of racism and bigotry, when the facts are people are hurting from illegal immigration. People are dying from illegal immigration. But the press would rather sell stories about how America is a big bad bully, instead of a story about it protecting its own citizens.
I do not think a lot of people are aware of what is really going on with the economy right now. They do not want to hear any more about the economy. They do not want to watch the news talk about the economy. But, the truth of the matter is, regardless of all the speeches, talks and news broadcasts, not one person is telling you: what really is going on; why it is going on; and what you can do to stop it. I have already gone over in my economic blog what were some of the reason of this economic depression. What I would like to discuss today is what you can do personally to take control of your financial destiny, AND in so doing it, help your fellow citizen take control of his financial destiny by proxy.
You might be wondering, why you would be influenced to help your fellow citizen take control of his financial destiny. The answer is simple. By doing what I am about to reveal to you, you are helping yourself. If just 30% of the population helps themselves, this economic depression will be over.
Obama Makes Sure He Reminds People He Will Not Support Any Black Issues
Remember He's Half White Too
In an unprecedented election, more Black people voted for president Barrack Obama than they had ever turned out before in the nation. Motivated by a sense of duty and to set a historical precedent, that Black people could hold the highest office in the land, Black people voted him in. Make no mistake about it, had not Black people overwhelmingly voted for Barrack Obama, he would not be president today.
With such widespread support, there must be an agenda that Black people are expecting him to carry out. But, we got it backwards. You don't give the money away, THEN ask for the goods. That is stupid. If you voted for him simply because he IS half Black, then it is your stupidity that was played on for receiving such an uncaring president, the likes of which the country hasn't seen since Reagan.
After a full year of the Obama administration, no one can say that we cannot judge President Obama based on his actions. There is plenty of both time and evidence that we can point to as "this is his." All of the inflammatory accusations of the campaign are over and no amount of rhetoric can clear up a clear pattern that is emerging from the Obama administration. When people made their accusations it was always pawned off as "that's just the campaign rhetoric going on." Now a year later we have nothing to pawn off deliberate and open accusations.
Intellectuals are clearly drinking the Obama cool aid and they refuse to see the man for what he is, a corporate shill. Where everyone saw Bush as trouncing on the constitution at every step, everyone looks the other way when Obama does it. Also the two administrations are identical. No one can deny that Bush and Obama policies are one and the same. It makes you wonder what these intellectual yes-men are even looking at, when they try and defend him.
Let's look at the similarities:
Both signed bailouts despite overwhelming protests [congress has never had, in its history, as many people contact them against any legislation in the history of the U.S.]
Both appointed czars, Obama is still appointing more
Both are spying on U.S. citizens by using federal agencies and private companies
Both funded faith initiatives for faith based groups, Obama even expanded that
God apparently spoke to Bush, and he got flack for that, and Obama doesn't get flack for it
Both met privately with religious leaders of all faiths, including Muslims, never done before with the president of the U.S.
Both agree with all Zionist policies
Both appointed lobbyists and special interest group operators to key government positions, including the secretary of the treasury
Both agree with the worst unconstitutional document of the entire history of the U.S. "the patriot act"
Both have had protesters sequestered, arrested, stopped, harassed, have had the media publicly humiliate them, labeled protesters as terrorists, and enlisted state police to arrest U.S. citizens for protesting
Both have socialized private businesses and nationalized big corporations, however tax payers pay for the bailout but the companies keep all the profit checks
Both have been lock and step with each other in every social "reform", there is no difference between the two on social policies from welfare to healthcare, affirmative action to aids, gay marriage to capital punishment, they vote and agree 100% with each other
Both men have agreed to support the huge military industrial complex and continue or even accelerate world wide war fronts
Intellectuals like Dr. Lamont Hill, Dr. Boyce Watkins blindly follow and agree with everything President Obama does and says, regardless of the obvious facts that they are unconstitutional or are in favor of big business. Keep in mind that during the Bush administration EVERYONE knew he was for big business. But, for some reason, although Obama is signing into law, daily, legislation that is for big business, none of these intellectuals see this, nor take him to task.
Please note that Obama is supposedly a democrat and Bush was supposedly a republican. Yet, both men have agreed and congress has agreed on every policy that both men enacted. And, both have been courted and prodded to sign legislation that is exclusively for wall street and not for you and me.
You can argue all you want and defend all you want, but the facts are plain for everyone to see. Obama has signed into law exactly the same things that Bush did.
If you are an actual intellectual you can see that his rhetoric is the same as Bush's and he uses the same tactics: present a policy against the American public, that is for big business, yet say it is a good thing for the public.
Examples:
Obama says he is going to reform health care that is for American citizens - the health care industry and the insurance companies wrote the legislation
Obama says he is going to reform banking - the bankers wrote the legislation
Obama says we need to stay in Iraq and Afghanistan to fight the war on terror - each country has a civil war that has nothing to do with the U.S. and the big contracters pressure the White House and congress to continue and escalate the wars so they make even more money
Obama says we need a stimulus package to keep the economy going and keep consumers confident and buying - the stimulus package went to big businesses and had consumers stopped purchasing and saved their money our economy would have converted back to a producer and creditor nation, and not remained a debtor nation
It has really come full circle. The chickens have come home to roost. I'm not talking about the CIA term "blowback", where actions our secret service does to other countries comes back to haunt us. I am talking about our very open and direct actions which are crimes against humanity. Have you noticed that since 9/11 that there aren't so many reports about the "war" in Iraq? Why? Because, the latest news is rather ugly. The reports of what really is going on in Iraq have come home and they aren't pretty. Take for instance the reports about Fallujah. It was in Fallujah that the U.S. armed forced committed a massacre of over a million civilians. One my protest that the armed forces had no idea they were innocent civilians, but it was shown they did know. In fact it was shown that during the massacre it became customary to trick civilians to come out of their homes and then slaughter them in the street. It became customary to storm a house, drag the citizens out, and humiliate the father in front of the family. A practice known to scar the entire family for life, since they treat each other with the highest respect over there.
Blowback is the espionage term for the violent, unintended consequences of a covert operation that are suffered by the civil population of the aggressor government. To the civilians suffering it, the blowback typically manifests itself as “random” acts of political violence without a discernible, direct cause; because the public—in whose name the intelligence agency acted—are ignorant of the effected secret attacks that provoked revenge (counter-attack) against them.
Not only did reports come in, but documentaries of the wholesale slaughter of innocent civilians have been made. Some are quite popular as well, selling millions of copies. These documentaries showed armed forces using incendiary bombs on civilians homes; beating, maiming and slaughtering children; raping female children; and burning and collapsing huge apartment buildings known to have thousands of people inside. These documentaries show armed forces using new Napalm, which burns the flesh off of live people. They show chemical warfare use. And, it all comes back to "against innocent civilians."
I heard some incredible number, in the millions, being quoted about the number of Iraqis who have died at the hands of the U.S. in this "war." Notice I keep saying "war." But, the fact is, Iraq has not been "declared" to be a war by Congress, as prescribed in our Constitution.
In the United States, Congress which makes the rules for the military has the power under the Constitution to "declare War," however there is no prescribed legal format for what a War declaration will look like in the US Constitution or by law. Declarations have the force of law and are intended to be executed by a Commander in Chief when called into actual service. The last time United States passed a bill with the title "Declaration of War" was in 1942, against Romania. Since then, the United States has used the term "Authorization to use Military Force" as in the case against Iraq in 2003. Many times, such as the US Invasion of Haiti in 1993, decisions for military engagements were made by US presidents, without formal approval by Congress, based on UN Security Council resolutions that did not declare UN or its members at war. This has been seen also as a subterfuge to allow the United States to dispense with the international laws of war, for example by declaring hostages as criminals rather than as prisoners of war.
So we see that Iraq is not a war at all. So what really is going on in Iraq? Well, it seems to be a lot of unnecessary slaughter going on over there. Unnecessary, for one simple fact: Iraq has never posed a threat to the U.S.. Iraq was, in fact, our ally all the way up to the day we invaded. Even after the Kuwait ordeal we were still on friendly terms with Iraq. In fact, we put Saddam Hussein in power. We did that.
It is My Duty to Speak Out
You may try and construct a chain of command and make an organization where one does not and cannot think for one's self. However, as humans, invariably there will be a few humans who will be slightly less a moron than the other people you have recruited and figure out that what they are being told to do is: against their own beliefs; against God; against humanity.
It is one thing to be ordered to go shoot at people that are shooting at you. It is another thing to be ordered to shoot soccer moms; drop huge, gargantuan bombs on city centers filled with milkmen, candlestick makers, maids, candy salesmen, shoe repairmen. It is one thing to give the order and then to have the wife of the candlestick maker crying inconsolably over her husband asking why this is happening. It is one thing to give the order and then see children crawling on the ground with a leg and arm blown off screaming for their mother. It is one thing to give the order and then hear a baby crying only to be silenced by a gunshot to the head followed by a sick wet sound of its blood running down the crib.
This is not what America wants. This is not what the world wants. If George Bush were to do this to us inside the United States, U.N. forces would have arrested him and congress and the top military brass and tried them for war crimes and genocide. Right now though the U.N. is mired in red tape over this "war" that isn't a "war".
Jeremiah Wright Thrown Under the Bus
It was a fact that Jeremiah Wright, minister of President Obama's former church was thrown under the bus for political expediency. All the stations looped Reverend Wright saying something ghastly over and over and over.
Fox News and others kept showing a sound bite of Jeremiah Wright saying "America's Chickens are Coming Home to Roost". That is the only sound bite they showed of the sermon. But in actuality Reverend Wright was quoting U.S. Ambassador Edward Peck, a retired, "white", career U.S. diplomat who served 32-years in the U.S. Foreign Service and was chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq under Jimmy Carter -- hardly the black-rage image with which Wright has been stigmatized.
Obama instead of explaining that Jeremiah Wright was quoting a U.S. ambassador and that what both learned men were saying was correct, instead took the low road to save his political campaign. Reverend Wright was then left with the reputation of being some Black objectionary, militant, racist, when in fact he was and is the opposite.
Now we come to the real story. We come to the story that cannot be denied any longer. We cannot deny it, because the story is now coming from our very troops. The U.S. is slaughtering people in Iraq for no good reason. More and more veterans of the war are speaking out and sounding the same bell that the learned Reverend Jeremiah Wright [also a former Marine] sounded in his now infamous sermon.
Iraq Veterans Against the War is a group of veterans who have organized to speak out against this horrible war. They have organized together so that no one could quiet them individually and so that Americans can really know what our military ambassadors are doing in our good name. It is a shame they had to organize in such a way, but this is the reality of the situation. If they speak out individually, they won't be heard; they get life threats; they get black balled out of various things; they get denied things owed to them.
No longer can we just sit at the dinner table and laugh at Reverend Jeremiah Wright, AND by proxy Ambassador Edward Peck, but now we have to pay attention because our sons and daughters are coming home saying how much truth both men were telling.
The obvious question is: Does Obama know? Actually most of these atrocities did not happen on his watch. However, they are still going on, so yes he must know. He needs to bring the troops home immediately.
I know why they are over there. While, politically it's quite a grey area, the execution of it, has and is horrible. I say grey area, because had I been in Bush's shoes I may have wanted to remove Sadam myself. But, that's the bully way of doing things, isn't it? I have a brain and would have found some other way to get Saddam to agree with me. So the entire war was and is unnecessary.
You might ask what is it I know about the war? It is quite simple once you hear it.
My dates might be off by some months, but the facts are very similar. The current world currency is the U.S. dollar (USD), right? Everyone knows that. One of the chief and most important things that is traded in the USD is oil. Well in mid 2,000 Saddam Hussein, bless his heart, declared that Iraq would now move his oil exports to the Euro. He completely removed the USD from his countries oil exports entirely. It was a brilliant move and would shore up Iraqs wealth immensely since the dollar was and is a completely fiat currency that is nearly worthless. Bush and friends were sitting on their thumbs wondering what to do to get Saddam back into trading oil with dollars. If they didn't do something soon, the entire middle east would follow the lead of Saddam.
This is what is known as "Petrodollar Warfare."
Well what does that mean? It means we would have to pay the real price of oil finally. And more than likely either our economy would collapse over night or we would go back to producing stuff that the entire world wants to buy. Instead of going that route, Bush declared Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, which Hanz Blick squarely said he didn't, MONTHS before, even wrote a book about it, and invaded Iraq. Within days of the invasion, they removed the government of Iraq, set another one in its place, and repealed the declaration to trade oil in Euros instead of dollars.
That's what this war is about. Not oil, not greed, not any other weird or sinister thing. The rest of the middle east is kind of on the fence about this whole Iraq thing. On the one hand they realy did not like Saddam, remember we put him in power. On the other hand, what he was doing was interesting by leaving the dollar trade in oil.
So Why are We Still in Iraq?
That my frend is the billion dollar question. And, I'm going to give you the answer, and it is not going to make any damn sense to you.
The reason we are still in Iraq is because American companies are making too much damn money to leave.
That's right. This is now, not about security, nor terrorism, nor pride, nor democracy. This is about huge, super huge companies, that are in control of the government that is bleeding us and Iraq dry. They have got their teeth firmly latched onto our necks and are not going to let go. They literally make a million dollars each month washing the clothes of the military over there. In fact, they made it a punishable rule that servicemen cannot wash their own clothes. They are drinking every last drop of blood we have and our politicians are letting them.
Conclusion
I wonder when they were briefing Obama, after he won, about these companies and the war, what his reaction was. I wonder if the was shocked, amazed or disgusted. Can you imagine win the seat to the most powerful position in the world and then being told that basically you have no power and that those days of the president issuing decrees and fighting congress are long gone. But, the show lingers on.
Let me leave you with this quote:
"the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government," and that "America was founded on genocide, and a nation that is founded on genocide is destructive." - Dr. Martin Luther King
1976 46 million took the swine flu shot. 4,000 Americans brought law suits against the U.S. government amounting to $3.5 billion in damages because of what happened after taking the shot. Two thirds of the claims were for neurological damage or even death triggered by the flu shot.
The government scared people into taking the shot by saying it was the same strain that caused the pandemic of 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over one half million dead in the U.S. as well as twenty million around the world.
A nurse who took the shot on wednesday last week is still feeling sick. She got high fever and shivers from the swine flu shot. "I was shaking in my whole body. "It was so sever that I could not even hold a glass of water in my hand," Lotta Lindström says. "I am now thinking about what it is I have been injected with. I really was affected. It feels really unpleasant."
What was the scare about in 1976? An army soldier died after catching the flu. However, the facts were never revealed. There were 4 other soldiers that came down with the same flu. The 4 other soldiers fully recovered. The one that died however, from his sickbed, got up and went on a forced march and then died.
There were no other cases of people dying from the same strain of flu. Also the vaccine that was developed to cure the strain was never tested. Also the public was not informed about any side effects, other than arm soreness, fever and discomfort.
Maria Strindlund is not so sure she made the right choice to take the shot. She also got a severe fever and shivering reaction. "Since I work as a nurse I decided it was the best thing to do," she says. At first she felt nothing from the vaccinaton, but a few hours later the side effects kicked in. "I got a extreme pain in my arm. I could no longer lift it." The came the fever and the shivering. "I was lying in bed shivering and was feeling very cold and stood in a hot shower to get warm." She says many colleguse who also took the vaccine have had similar reactons.
The CDC had been told that there could be severe consequences with immunizing the public with the swine flu vaccine, however they chose to ignore the warnings and failed the warn the public.
There is no research going into any of these vaccines. Also, these "deaths" are completely false and made up. When you request to see the evidence of the blood sample taken from the corpses of the dead people, there is no evidence of a swine flue nor any other virus. Several reporters have requested the samples be made available for medical observation and none of them have been given.
Swine flu, or any other flu is not fatal to a healthy adult. In fact, if you take at least 2,000 I.U. of Vitamin D, it will completely immunize you from the flu and get rid of any symptoms you might currently have. It is unconscionable what the "medical" profession is doing by going along with this farce of a vaccine. The CDC was sued for billions of dollars when the swine flu vaccine crippled, maimed and caused the deaths of thousands.
The End Game
Of course you have to follow the money. The end result is that this scare is being drummed up for you and your insurance companies to pay for these vaccines. Imagine how many billions, no trillions of dollars are going to be spent worldwide just on this one vaccine.
The drum beat started slow. As more and more time went on and it was found that people were not startled into taking the vaccine like they did in 1976, the drum beat got louder and louder. It is now to the point that the president of the United States of America is declaring a national emergency to get you to pay for this vaccine.
Another nurse Jennely could hardly walk five meters after she got sick from the 'swine flu' vaccination. She was completely healthy when she got the shot but the day after she had 39 degrees centigrade fever (102.2 F). "I could hardly walk the five meters I had to the bathroom," she says. The fever lasted for three days. Several of her colleagues at work had similar experiences. "I know of at least ten that got fever, we are about 80 people at my workplace."
This is an abuse of power and authority, the likes of which the world has never seen before. No president of a country should ever declare a national emergency outside the threat of invasion. Let me impress upon you how serious these words are. Our president is declaring that he can now invoke martial law across the land, declare curfew, call the national guard, call the military since they repealed posse comitatus forbidding the military from being used inside the united states, force you to take vaccines, force your children to take vaccines upon threat of prison. This is very DIRE. We are in danger of being thrown in jail if we do not take this vaccine. The president can declare martial law and throw U.S. citizens in jail for not taking the vaccine. The president can declare you an unfit parent and take your children away if you refuse to make them take the vaccine.
You should be mad as hell over this. The facts are:
a healthy adult cannot contract swine flu
swine flu has never been proven to cause 1 death, due to solely symptoms of the flu
swine flu is a made up virus
vitamin D in appropriate amounts kills any, ANY, AAAAAAANNNNNNNYYYYY virus
you do not need a flu shot
the swine flu vaccine was not tested
the swine flu vaccine causes neurological damage and leads to death
the swine flue vaccine contains mercury and a whole host of other toxins
There is absolutely no reason why you should be forced to take any vaccine, even less a vaccine that was not tested. You should never be forced to make your child take a vaccine. In fact threatening to take your child and jail you, for not giving the vaccine to your child should be grounds for major human rights violations, civil rights violations and constitutional rights violations. Anyone who would threaten you and your children over healthcare has overstepped the bounds of their own authority. No one can dictate to you, to force you to pay for a procedure concerning your own health or the health of your children. You have an undeniable, God given right over your own body, and the body of your loved ones. You are the ultimate authority of your body, and by proxy the ultimate authority over your children.
What You Don't Know Could Kill You
If you think 2,000 i.u. or 4,000 i.u. of vitamin D is too much, consider this: just 15 minutes in the sun will get you over 30,000 i.u. of vitamin D. I recommend you definitely take vitamin D in the fall all the way to the beginning of summer at least. There may be days in summer that you don't get out in the sun as well, so I recommend you take it year round.
If you have an emergency and really think you need to knock something out fast, take echinecia pills. Also, take a 30 day mega dose of Vitamin C. A mega dose is 10,000 i.u. or 50,000 i.u. or 100,000 i.u of Vitamin C. Studies have shown that diseases in the presence of a mega dose of vitamin cannot live. These studies date back all the way to the 1960s. The reason you don't know about them? [ might be your question ] Is that there is no money in a $30.00 bottle of vitamin C every month. Also, for those afraid of taking a mega dose of Vitamin C, it is water soluble. Meaning, you take the vitamin and it dissolves in water and is carried out through urine for the part your body does not use. Also, you might hear someone saying, "don't take mega doses of vitamins, it just makes for expensive urine." Either they are in the medical profession or industry themselves, or they have not had the benefit of seeing the studies on vitamins. Therefore ignore such charlatans. Nutrition has always been the foundation for perfect health.
Every study that has given a mega dose of Vitamins to their patients have show significant results in the patients. You don't need to maintain mega doses of vitamins. Upkeep of vitamins is relatively small, only 1,000 or 2,000 i.u. daily for upkeep. It is when you develop something or are malnourished in something, that you need to take the mega doses.
Representative Joe Wilson (R) South Carolina yelled out "You Lie" to President Obama as he was giving a joint session of congress address. President Obama was asserting that the health care plan that he is proposing would "not" cover illegal aliens, contrary to popular belief. It was at this point that Rep. Joe Wilson yelled out "You Lie".
HR3200 the Obama Health Care Plan and Illegal Aliens
Let's look into the bill and what it actually does say about illegal aliens and receiving benefits from the ObamaCare plan. The simple fact is President Obama was in fact lying. The method by which illegal immigrants will come to be covered under ObamaCare is through the bill's (HR3200) failure to contain any
citizenship verification requirement or
enforcement mechanism mandated to verify one's eligibility.
Other federal programs routinely carry language requiring proof of citizenship before allowing access to benefits.
Congressional democrats defeated two bills which actually enunciated a requirement to show proof of citizenship and an enforcement mechanism to verify one's eligibility. The only proof required for the ObamaCare plan pertains to family income. The democrats then crafted the current HR3200 to cover illegal aliens as well as citizens. The tremendous downside is that citizens would pay into this an illegal aliens would not, nor would their be required to pay into it.
The CDC estimates that of the $2 trillion spent on health issues, $1.5 trillion is spent on preventable diseases caused by bad diet.
The healthcare crisis is then a euphemism for the food crisis. If Obama doesn't address anything about food i.e. nutrition in school lunch programs, then you know he is bought and sold by agribusiness.
For the city of New York, the cost for treating each new case of type 2 diabetes is $500,000. It is bankrupting the city. Once contracted it's $13,000 / yr in additional medical costs; it takes approximately 10 years off of your life span; there an increased 80% chance of heart disease; a possibility of amputation; a possibility of blindness; being tethered to machines and drugs for the rest of your life. It is entirely preventable, with a change in diet.
The government could save trillions upon trillions of dollars if they spent money on ad campaigns: warning against the dangers of soda; warning against the dangers of sugar in the diet; warning against fast food more than once every 2 months; warning against the dangers of monosodium glutamate; warning against the dangers of high fructose corn syrup; warning against high saturated fat diets.
If children ceased drinking soda, nearly all preventable diseases would vanish from their lives. The reason we have soda so plentifully now, is that it is so cheap. Why is it so cheap? Because we subsidize corn, which is then used as high fructose corn syrup to sweeten soda. So in essence, every time you buy soda, you are taking extra money out of your own pocket, which goes to pay the corn farmer, and you are killing yourself and everyone that drinks it. Corn lobbyist flood Washington and give senators and congressmen lavish gifts and favors to continue subsidizing corn.
Are you going to hear anything from Obama about diet as it pertains to healthcare? No. The pharmaceutical industry is the largest lobby in Washington. Surprising? Why would we need to dwarf all over lobbyist from an industry supposedly in place to help us survive.
What the Health Care Industry Isn't Telling you
Interesting fact: "By its own statistics, the American medical system is the number one cause of death and injury in the U.S."
"Patients who undergo standard medical treatment for heart disease die sooner than comparable patients not receiving any treatment."
"Cholesterol drugs are huge sellers, yet the medical industry's own studies prove that patients are dying from them. In addition to being totally dangerous, they're totally unnecessary, as 15 years of research actually sows that cholesterol is a healthy sign and does not contribute to heart disease. Glucose and fructose are the true culprits of heart disease."
"Immunity is not provided through vaccines, as those vaccinated contract the very disease they've been vaccinated for at a higher rate than those not vaccinated. Those receiving a flu vaccine this season are receiving a vaccine developed against last year's strain, vaccines contain some of the most poisonous substances known to man, such as aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde, and are frequently contaminated with viruses that cause serious diseases. There is a definite link between the explosion of autism in children and mercury in vaccines."
"A major cause of the increase in breast cancer is the practice of annual mammography, exposing women to high doses of radiation and actually giving them breast cancer."
"Chemotherapy was derived from mustard gas. It has been proven ineffective in 96% - 98% of cancer cases and being an agent used to kill enemies at war, kills patients sooner than the cancer would have."
"Pharmaceutical drugs are not engineered to cure diseases, nor to make your healthier. Pharmaceutical drugs are far more likely to kill than illegal drugs. They are only interested in selling you a product by managing your disease, not curing it. Thousands of studies and evidence shows that diet can completely cure cancer."
"Medical school does not teach health, nor healing. Nursing school students are told to "not take vitamins"."
"Some medications used to treat psychological "disorders" are more addictive than any illegal drug. Ritalin is more potent to the brain than cocaine, children who take it are far more likely to abuse cocaine later due to the similarities between the two. The number of suicide attempts at least doubles for a child taking antidepressants, according to short-term studies. Some people who have managed to stop taking the drugs say they were only obsessed with suicide while on the drug. Antidepressants are the most widely prescribed drugs in the U.S."
"Diet drinks are still selling despite studies linking aspartame to seizures, MS and ironically, weight gain."
"Calcium cannot be absorbed in the presence of protein, a fact well known to researchers, and therefore milk - being a complete protein - is not at all a source of calcium. Not only is milk not necessary for good bone health, it actually causes osteoporosis."
If you want to live a healthy long life: you want to get off of any medication as quickly as possible; you want to completely revamp your diet to be nutrition nutrition nutrition; don't drink bottled water; take a liquid vitamin; eat a lot of plants with no pesticides; east grass fed meats. I can almost guarantee if you changed your diet to one of pure nutrition and complete nutrition and no junk for at least 6 months, you'd not only see health changes, you'd see your weight change as well. You also must walk at least 30 minutes a day. When I say healthy, I mean no pesticides, no sugars, pure vitamins and minerals at every meal with at least 5 meals a day. Do not buy any processed food, this includes at the supermarket. Don't buy any premade dinners. In fact, don't buy any food that comes packaged other than butchered meat. If you can locate a farmers market near you, that would be perfect. Cook your own meals, and don't use a microwave. Season your food with pure seasoning, not processed junk.
