Top 10 Reasons Why Girls Don't Want a Nice Guy

Girls Don't Want a Nice Guy

Through extensive interviews and research, (no, not just my cousins this time) I have compiled a list of the top 10 reason why girls don't like nice guys. Oh they say they want a nice guy, but at the end of the day, they don't date nice guys. I know it's a double standard, that girls need to appear to be respectable, i.e. not a sleezy slut, so they try and be seen with a decent guy, but they crave bad boys. All those guys in jail prove it. They all have or had girl friends. So the message is clear, broken English; high-school drop out; police record; getting into fights, is a sure way to get in bed with 99.999999% of the girls on the planet.




What's worse is, the very thing that women crave, they look for in a man with the opposite qualities. And, what are these qualities that women want? Oh that's easy:

• strength
• protection
• freedom

They are under the assumption that they cannot get these qualities in a nice guy, so they go looking for it in a bad boy.

Top 10 Reasons Why Nice Guys Finish Last

1. Nice guys have no adventure or are not wild and crazy: women are constantly thinking that good guys are boring and have absolutely no fun.  Apparently good guys stay home and read books (or write blogs, wait a minute, that's me *gasp*).  Girls don't think good guys have any "fun", like getting arrested?
2. Nice guys have no sense of humor: turn on any t.v. show and you'll find some idiot guy punching, kicking, tripping or falling, and laughing about it.  Even videos online have guys getting into fights and laughing about it.  If you're a guy in a public computer place, your best bet to get a chick is to watch one of those videos and laugh at it and ask a cute girl to come watch it with you.  9 out of 10 of those girls will give you their number on the spot.
3. Nice guys cry.  Girls think that being sensitive in a man is a sign of complete weakness.  It's an extremely unfair double standard.  They want a guy to ask them what's wrong with them when they're sad, but God forbid he ever has a bad day.  You can't have a guy that is sensitive enough to see when you're sad, yet not feel sad himself.  He either is sensitive or he's not.  He either knows when you're crying, because he cries too, or he doesn't give a rat's patoot at all.
4. Nice guys run away from fights.  However dumb that even sounds, girls think that bad boys will stick up for them [the girl] and for themselves.  What women have no understanding is that intimidation is how most fights are actually won.  Guys don't lift weights to be better fighters, we lift weights so we can be physically menacing.  How many men in the U.S. are actually on a professional football team?  That would be about 0.00000001% of the male population.  Yet the fitness industry has exploded.  There are more physically fit and bodybuilder level men now that ever in the history of mankind.  And, it's not because men need to be that big.
5. Nice guys don't drink / smoke.  This may vary around the country.  Around here there is a huge section of the population that is from a cult, and they don't drink or smoke.  No girl wants to date them, except the other cult girls, but ... anywho.  Girls feel they cannot go "out" with nice guys and have a little night on the town.  Trust me, going to the library, as a date, is no fun.  I've done it.  LOL  She asked me to meet her there so, don't blame me.
6. Nice guys are not confident.  This is one of the biggest complaints girls have about nice guys.  While noone wants to be physically abused, a lot of women want to be manhandled.  They want to physically feel the strength of the guy on their body.  This is why so many women are attracted to big body builder guys.  Even fat guys are more successful than skinny guys.  Being physically imposing, goes a long way with women.  Although the good guy would say he's being polite, most women have absolutely no concept of manners.  At least, in this day and age they do not.  Girls have no idea that saying "excuse me" is actually polite.  Therefore they are attracted to a guy that simply brushes by them, more than a guy that waits until you get out of the way, or says excuse me as he walks by.
7. Nice guys don't make "moves".  While this is a huge oxymoron, it made the list.  This is just to show you how stupid [no offense] these girls are.  You see, they're talking out of both sides of their mouth.  On the one hand they say that good guys don't make moves on them, but at the end of the day, neither do bad boys.  In both cases the girl makes the first move and makes all the moves thereafter.  You see the bad boy ignores the girl, which turns her on.  So either they want to be ignored or they don't want to be ignored.  They complain that the good guy is too shy and doesn't make a move, but then the bad boy doesn't make a move either.
8. Nice guys don't have money.  This right here ... sigh.  So the story is that bad boys, who probably just got through mugging someone, give the girls money occasionally and nice guys don't.  Oh the nice guy pays for a meal, but he doesn't hand over wads of cash.  Even if they girl knows where the bad boy got the money, they don't care.  As long as they hand them the money, they don't care.  They also think that bad boys have more potential to be rich some day, probably from watching how evil bastards do get rich in business.
9. Nice  guys are creepy or stalk you.  Although, this is by definition, not a good guy, this made the list.  Girls think that being nice is so strange that it is creepy.  A guy that smiles at you, laughs at your jokes, buys you a drink, is somehow interpreted as creepy.  I chalk this up to girls just be schizo and not knowing what they want.
10. Nice guys don't know how stuff.  I didn't go into details, but, apparently being a good guy automatically means that you do boring stuff and immediately fall asleep.  Many, many girls said they want a bad boy behind closed doors.  They tended to shy away from good guys on this very fact.  Even if they truly wanted a nice guy, they turned him down because at the back of their mind, nice guys cannot handle behind closed doors. 

Solution for Nice Guys

Don't Stop Being a Nice Guy

Well after that list, what can a nice guy do?  It is my learned opinion, after viewing this entire list and going through all of the copious information I gathered for this scholarly article, that only one conclusion can be drawn from it:

NICE GUYS SHOULD ONLY DATE NICE GIRLS

And, there you have it.  It is a peculiar type of woman that craves for a bad boy.  I observed that only bad girls, in some form, want bad boys.  They spoke of how they wanted some guy to be "open minded".  This means to me that they themselves are lacking and therefore, they need someone who can deal with their lack.  People say that women are emotional.  Well, after asking this question and looking hundreds of girls right in the eye, I can safely say that, girls a emotional.  I don't think emotional quite captures it.


This was fun to do.

 Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Kindle

The Amazon Kindle is a portable e-book reader. More precisely, it is a software, hardware and network platform developed by Amazon.com subsidiary Lab126 that utilizes wireless connectivity to enable users to shop for, download, browse, and read e-books, newspapers, magazines, blogs, and other digital media in some countries.

Several hardware devices support this platform, including a main "Kindle" line and a parallel "Kindle DX" line. The most recent Kindle device is the third incarnation of the main line, officially named "Kindle", but usually referred to as "Kindle 3". Kindle 3 was released on August 27, 2010. User reports indicate that the new display, with E Ink Pearl technology on the Kindle 3 is noticeably superior to previous generations.

The Kindle DX line features larger screens than the main Kindle line. It is marketed as more suitable for displaying newspaper and textbook content; however, no Kindle model preserves the print edition page numbers used when citing sources in school papers and scholarly research.[8][9] Amazon has also introduced Kindle software for use on various devices and platforms, including Microsoft Windows, iOS, BlackBerry, Mac OS X (10.5 onwards), Android and Windows Phone 7.

The Kindle hardware devices use an e-ink electronic paper display that features 16 shades of grey. This allows for a long battery life and easy readability. Content for the Kindle can be purchased online and downloaded wirelessly in some countries, using either standard Wi-Fi or Amazon's 3G "Whispernet" network. Whispernet is accessible without any monthly fee or wireless subscription, although fees can be incurred for the delivery of periodicals and other content when roaming internationally beyond the customer's home country. Through a service called "Whispersync", customers can synchronize reading progress, bookmarks and other information across Kindle hardware devices and other mobile devices.

Amazon released the Kindle First Generation on November 19, 2007, for US$399 and was sold out in five and a half hours. The device remained out of stock for five months until late April 2008.

It is the only Kindle with expandable memory, via an SD card slot.

The device features a 6 inch (diagonal) 4-level grayscale display, with 250 MB of internal memory, which can hold approximately 200 non-illustrated titles.

Amazon did not sell the Kindle First Generation outside the United States. Plans for a launch in the UK and other European countries were delayed by problems with signing up suitable wireless network operators.

On February 10, 2009, Amazon announced the Kindle 2.[20] It became available for purchase on February 23, 2009. The Kindle 2 features a text-to-speech option to read the text aloud, and 2 GB of internal memory of which 1.4 GB is user-accessible. By Amazon's estimates the Kindle 2 can hold about 1500 non-illustrated books. Unlike the Kindle First Generation, Kindle 2 does not have a slot for SD memory cards.[21] It was slimmer than the original Kindle.[22][23][24]

To promote the new Kindle, author Stephen King made UR, his then-new novella, available exclusively through the Kindle Store. On October 22, 2009, Amazon stopped selling the original Kindle 2 in favor of the international version it had introduced earlier in the month.

According to an early review by iFixIt, the Kindle 2 features a Freescale 532 MHz, ARM-11 90 nm processor, 32 MB main memory, 2 GB moviNAND flash storage and a 3.7 V 1530 mAh lithium polymer battery.

On November 24, 2009, Amazon released a firmware update for the Kindle 2 that it said increases battery life by 85% and introduces native PDF support.

On July 8, 2009, Amazon reduced price of the Kindle 2 from the original $359 to $299. On October 7, 2009, Amazon further reduced the price of the Kindle 2 to $259. The Kindle 2 was criticized[28] for its high original retail price, compared to the $185.49 manufacturing cost estimated by iSuppli.

On October 7, 2009, Amazon announced an international version of the Kindle 2 that works in over 100 countries. It became available October 19, 2009. The international Kindle 2 is physically very similar to the U.S.-only model, although it uses a different mobile network standard.

The original Kindle 2 uses CDMA2000, for use on the Sprint network. The international version uses standard GSM and 3G GSM, enabling it to be used on AT&T's U.S. mobile network and internationally in 100 other countries.

Kindle 2 International Version is believed to have a noticeably higher contrast screen, although Amazon does not advertise this.

On October 22, Amazon lowered the price on the international version from $279 to $259 and discontinued the U.S.-only model. On June 21, 2010, hours after Barnes & Noble lowered the price of its Nook, Amazon lowered the price of the Kindle 2 to $189, undercutting the Nook by $10.

Amazon released a "Kindle for PC" application in late 2009, available as a free download for Windows 7, Vista, and XP.[36] This application allows thousands of books to be read on a personal computer in color, with no Kindle unit required, as e-books can simply be purchased from Amazon's store. Amazon later released a version for the Macintosh, in early 2010. In June 2010, Amazon released a "Kindle for Android" version. With the Android application release, versions for the Apple iPhone, the iPad, PC and Mac computers, and BlackBerry cellphones are also available. In January 2011, Amazon released Kindle for Windows Phone 7.

Kindle sales

Specific Kindle sales numbers are not released by the company, however, Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon.com, stated in a shareholders' meeting in January 2010 that "millions of people now own Kindles." According to anonymous inside sources, over three million Kindles have been sold as of December 2009,[42] while external estimates, as of Q4-2009, place the number at about 1.5 million. According to James McQuivey of Forrester Research, estimates are ranging around four million, as of mid-2010.[44] The third-generation Kindle is now the bestselling product in Amazon's history, eclipsing "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Book 7).

Users can bookmark, highlight and look up content. Pages can be dog-eared for reference and notes can be added to relevant content. While a book is open on the display, menu options allow users to search for synonyms and definitions from the built-in dictionary. The device also remembers the last page read for each book. Pages can be saved as a "clipping", or a text file containing the text of the currently displayed page. All clippings are appended to a single file, which can be downloaded over a USB cable.

Remote content removal

On July 17, 2009, Amazon.com withdrew certain Kindle titles, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, from sale, refunded the cost to those who had purchased them, and remotely deleted these titles from purchasers' devices after discovering that the publisher lacked rights to publish the titles in question. Notes and annotations for the books made by users on their devices were left in a separate file, but "rendered useless" without the content they were directly linked to. The move prompted outcry and comparisons to Nineteen Eighty-Four itself. In the novel, books, magazines and newspapers in public archives that contradict the ruling party are edited or destroyed, long after being published; the removed materials go "down the Memory Hole", nickname for an incinerator chute. Customers and commentators noted the resemblance to the censorship in the novel, and described Amazon's action in Orwellian terms. Some critics also argued that the deletion violated the Kindle's Terms of Service, which states in part:

"Upon your payment of the applicable fees set by Amazon, Amazon grants you the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy of the applicable Digital Content and to view, use and display such Digital Content an unlimited number of times, solely on the Device or as authorized by Amazon as part of the Service and solely for your personal, non-commercial use."

Amazon spokesman Drew Herdener stated that the company is "… changing our systems so that in the future we will not remove books from customers' devices in these circumstances." On July 23, 2009, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos posted an apology about the company's handling of the matter on Amazon's official Kindle forum. Bezos said the action was "stupid", and that the executives at Amazon "deserve the criticism received."

On July 30, 2009, Justin Gawronski, a Michigan high-school senior, and Antoine Bruguier, a California engineer, filed suit against Amazon in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Gawronski argued that Amazon had violated their terms of service by remotely deleting the copy of Nineteen Eighty-Four he had purchased, in the process preventing him from accessing annotations he had written. Bruguier also had his copy deleted without his consent, and found Amazon "deceit[ful]" in an email exchange. The complaint, which requested class-action status, asked for both monetary and injunctive relief. The case was settled on September 25, 2009, with Amazon agreeing to pay $150,000 divided between the two plaintiffs, on the understanding that the law firm representing them, Kamber Edelson LLC, "...will donate its portion of that fee to a charitable organization...". The settlement also saw Amazon guaranteeing wider rights to Kindle owners over their eBooks:

For copies of Works purchased pursuant to TOS granting "the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy" of each purchased Work and to "view, use and display [such Works] an unlimited number of times, solely on the [Devices]. . . and solely for [the purchasers'] personal, non-commercial use", Amazon will not remotely delete or modify such Works from Devices purchased and being used in the United States unless (a) the user consents to such deletion or modification; (b) the user requests a refund for the Work or otherwise fails to pay for the Work (e.g., if a credit or debit card issuer declines to remit payment); (c) a judicial or regulatory order requires such deletion or modification; or (d) deletion or modification is reasonably necessary to protect the consumer or the operation of a Device or network through which the Device communicates (e.g., to remove harmful code embedded within a copy of a Work downloaded to a Device).

On September 4, 2009, Amazon offered affected users a restoration of the deleted ebooks, an Amazon gift certificate, or a check for the amount of $30.

In December 2010, three eBooks were removed due to violations of Amazon's publishing guidelines. For what Amazon describes as "a brief period of time," the books were unavailable for redownload by users who had already purchased them. This ability was restored after it was brought to Amazon's attention; however no remote deletion took place.[

Adjacent Sibling Selectors are a way of styling an element that appears directly adjacent to another element. So, for example, if you knew that the first paragraph to follow an image in your XHTML was always going to be a caption, and you wanted that styled differently, you could write something like this:

img + p {
color: #999;
font-style: italic;
}

This would turn the paragraph immediately following the image gray and italicize it, all without any extra code in your XHTML.

Pseudo-Element Selectors refer to parts of your XHTML that aren’t technically elements of their own right, but can be easily distinguished from the surrounding code due to their nature. The most common two pseudo-elements (and the two we’re using here) are :first-letter and :first-line.

Creating a Book-Style Introductory Line

So what we need to do to create our book-style line is create a drop-cap of the first letter, and the rest of the first line in small caps. And we want to do it without having to resort to classes or IDs to get it done. What we’re assuming in this exercise is that your XHTML is already well-formed – your articles or chapters always start with a heading tag (I’m using < h4 > tags), and you’re using paragraph tags instead of (shudder) line breaks. So here’s how we do it:

You’ll start with some fairly simple XHTML that looks something like this:

Article Titles for Fun and Profit

This is our first paragraph. Don’t you think
the first line should stand out?

Our second paragraph doesn’t need such
fancy-pants styling.

And then we’ll use CSS to style the first line of the first paragraph following our 4th level heading:

h4 + p:first-line {
font-variant: small-caps;
font-size: 1.1em;
}

This gives us a small-capped line that is slightly larger than the rest of the surrounding text. Now, all we need to do is create our drop cap:

h4 + p:first-letter {
float: left;
font-size: 2.5em;
font-weight: bold;
font-family: "Monotype Corsiva",
"Apple Chancery", fantasy;
margin: 5px 5px 5px 0;
}

Here, I’ve floated the letter to the left (which causes the rest of the text to flow around it), increased its size, made it boldface, set it in a scripty font (you could chose any font here, but I was going for a bookish look), and added a bit of a margin to make sure there isn’t any overlap.

We’ve managed to create an introductory line without a single byte of XHTML.

And that’s all there is to it! You can see a finished example here. We’ve managed to create an old-school book-style introductory line without adding a single byte of XHTML. This is a quick and easy way to add some visual appeal to your articles. It could even make for an interesting addition to a print style sheet, adding a bit of classic authenticity.

Now, I have one caveat: this does not work in IE6. But the text simply degrades nicely into an otherwise unaffected first line. No harm, no foul.

"There Is No Such Thing As Coincidence, Just The Illusion Of Coincidence"

Paul Wellstone, honorable Democrat. His vote on October 11 against the war preceded his death (and his wife's and two of his children's) in the crash of a private airplane by 14 days.

Strange how coincidence works, huh?

Owners of the Fed are Pilgrim Society members, an elite of the papal Knight of Malta bankers.

Who is the Pilgrim Society?

All the important members of the 1910 Jekyll Island meeting (where the Fed was established) were Pilgrims; Vanderlip, Strong, Warburg, Davison, Norton, and Aldrich. Senator Aldrich's closest ally in congress, Edward B. Vreeland, was a Pilgrim too, together with his brother. Vreeland helped Aldrich establish a privately owned central bank. Of course, J.P. Morgan, George F. Baker, John D. Rockefeller, and Jacob Schiff were members also.


Pilgrim-presidents of the New York Federal Reserve Bank cover the period from 1914 to 1979. The 4 presidents since then have not been members as far as we know, although that's probably because of a lack of recent data. Pilgrim-chairmen of the New York Federal Reserve cover almost the entire period from the 1920s up to 1990, so we can safely assume that the New York Federal Reserve Bank is owned by the Pilgrims. That's not that unusual, because New York itself is Pilgrims property.
[link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]

Rothschild is Pilgrim Society
[link to www.nndb.com]

You're Not Playing Hard to Get You're playing Hard to Notice

Unattractive

So many girls are simply not taught by their mothers correctly of what the situation is in the dating scene.  Even worse, the father doesn't even mention dating to his little girl.  Sure some fathers go the opposite side of the road and try and scare the bejeezus out of the girl, telling her all sorts of horrific tales of how evil men are, but those aren't as common as those fathers who simply shut up and never mention anything.  In their efforts to keep their little girl from being hurt, battered, bruised or left alone, they end up leaving them to fend for themselves.  I mean, we're here to populate the planet.  We cannot do that by burying our heads in the sand and pretending the opposite gender doesn't exist.  So, we end up with a daughter that sits in a bar scared to death of some inevitable horror that will play out in her love life.  The end result is that she is miserable and whoever she "dates" is equally miserable.  Don't even get me started on those who got absolutely no heads up by their parents on dating, and thus went to MTV for their advice on how dating should be done.  Hello, Tila Tequila. [I followed her on twitter for about a month.  I just couldn't take how bad she is, and unfollowed her like a bad habit. But, you didn't hear that from me, cuz I ain't one to gossip.]



Speaking of sad, and the entire reason for this article, I see this tragedy play out all the time.  Girl sits at the bar, blending in with the upholstery, sighing.  Noone talks to her all night, and proceeds to go home and tell her pillow how there are "no good men left in the world."  She has a sense that she shouldn't be a total skank, so she tries to play "hard to get".  The problem is, she's not playing hard to get, she's playing hard to notice.

Let's be honest for a second.  For all the women out there that only attract bad boyfriends, look in the mirror honey, you're bad.  Like attracts like.  With that said, being afraid of attracting some horrible guy is not something that just happens by chance.  Sitting at a bar, hoping not to attract the "wrong" guy should not be your focus.  You should doll yourself up, lose the weight and be confident that the "right" guy will be attracted to you.

You have no idea how many friend girls I hear complain about how they never meet anyone.  I don't have the heart to tell them, it's them and not the guys.  I have no idea who would be attracted to hair that has never seen conditioner, a roller nor a highlight.  I have had grown women tell me there is no need for them to look attractive.  Really?  [Sigh]

Don't get me wrong, I'm not here to push the beauty industry down your throat but christ almighty, no moisturizer and broken straps are not something people need to see.  No, don't go buy the entire stock of the make-up counter at Neiman Marcus, but don't look like a sad puppy.

Some girls and women need to stop being delusional that they are playing hard to get and realize they are playing hard to notice.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Palms Owner Gets Court Date For His DUI

Palms Casino Owner George Maloof Jr. Gets Trial Date For DUI

George Maloof Jr.

by Jagajeet Chiba, Gambling911.com - Las Vegas casino magnate and Sacramento Kings co-owner George Maloof Jr. has a trial date for his DUI case.  Maloof Jr. is the owner of the Palms Casino.  On October 9 [2010] he was pulled over on suspicion of driving while under the influence just southwest of the Las Vegas Strip.

Maloof later told The Associated Press that he had four beers at a wedding and that his blood-alcohol level was measured at 0.086%.

That's just over the legal limit in Nevada of 0.08%, but Maloof said he thought he was "nowhere near intoxicated."

Maloof’s attorney Wade Rabenhorst stood before the judge this past week in his client’s absence.

A May 31 trial date has been set.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Palm Casino Owner Arrested for DUI

Palms Owner George Maloof Arrested for DUI

George Maloof Jr.

by The Associated Press [LAS VEGAS]  -- Palms Casino Resort owner George Maloof Jr. was arrested for drunken driving after being pulled over by police late Saturday night [October 9th, 2010].

George Maloof Jr. was arrested about 11:30 p.m. Saturday near Spanish Trail Country Club, where he lives, police said Monday. Maloof, 46, told The Associated Press he was driving home with his assistant from a friend's wedding at The Mirage hotel-casino about six miles away.

Maloof said the assistant asked him to drive. "I just didn't think I needed her to drive -- I should have had her drive -- because I didn't drink that much," said Maloof. He said he thought he was "nowhere near intoxicated" and would likely fight the arrest in court.

Maloof said he had four beers and his blood-alcohol level was measured at 0.086 percent. That's just over the legal limit in Nevada of 0.08 percent. He said he asked if he could go home but was told he would be arrested.

Police searched his car and his assistant's purse but found nothing else out of the ordinary, Maloof said. Police spokeswoman Barbara Morgan said Maloof was speeding 21 to 30 mph over the limit, made an illegal left turn and was driving without a valid license or proof of insurance.

Maloof said he didn't post bail and didn't want to call anyone, and was released from jail Sunday morning.

Maloof owns the resort with his brothers and sister. His family also owns the NBA's Sacramento Kings.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Nevada Supreme Court Doesn't Know Jack nor Pot

Nevada High Court Rejects Pot User's Driving Bid

Nevada "High" Court

RGJ.com By Martha Bellisle - A California woman who legally smoked marijuana in her home state and then drove across the Nevada state line with an "inactive" marijuana metabolite in her system still is guilty under the state's impaired driving law, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled.

Shira Garfinkel was convicted in Incline Justice Court of being over the legal limit of marijuana metabolite, which is the "inactive" substance the body produces to get ride of marijuana's active ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC.

Her lawyer, Deputy Public Defender Priscilla Nielson appealed, arguing that since the metabolite is an "inactive" substance, it "does not affect the person's ability to drive," and the law is unconstitutional.

Justices Nancy Saitta, Michael Cherry and Mark Gibbons disagreed.

In an unpublished decision, which means the ruling only applies to this case and does not set legal precedence, the justices said they already ruled in another case that the law appropriately applies to both marijuana's active ingredient and the metabolite, and they don't need to "revisit that decision."

They also dismissed Garfinkel's claims that the law "interferes with her right to travel" because she is a legal user of marijuana in California and Nevada's DUI law would keep her from crossing the state line.

The law does not prohibit her from traveling, the justices said, "it criminalizes her driving a motor vehicle through the state with prohibited substances in her blood and urine."

Nielson said she was "somewhat discouraged" with the ruling and that she has not yet decided if she'll ask the full court to review the case.

"I'm disappointed that they did not apply a legal analysis, they just looked at the bottom line of the Williams case," Nielson said.

Case details

Jessica Williams was convicted in 2002 of running over and killing six teenagers after smoking marijuana.

She appealed, and the high court affirmed her conviction, saying the law served two legitimate state interests: promoting highway safety and deterring the illicit use of drugs, Nielson said.

Nielson said that neither of those points apply in this case. The metabolite does not impact driving ability because it's inactive, and the drug use in this case was legal, she said.

According to William Anderson, chief toxicologist at the Washoe County crime lab, regular users of marijuana would have an almost continual level of metabolite in their systems.

Garfinkel was stopped for speeding on Tahoe Boulevard early in 2010 and charged with driving with a prohibited amount of a prohibited substance. She has a doctor-approved cannabis card that allows her to use the drug, under California law.

The courts

At her trial in Incline Village Justice Court, Judge Alan Tiras said she was not guilty of having THC in her system. Her test showed she had two nanograms of the THC, the legal limit.

But since the test is plus-or-minus 1 nanogram, he did not convict her. But he found her guilty of having the metabolite in her system. The test measured 20 nanograms of metabolite, and the legal limit is 5 nanograms.

She appealed to Washoe District Court, and Judge Robert Perry affirmed Tiras' ruling.

The next appeal took her argument to the Supreme Court, but the justices affirmed the conviction.

"Garfinkel's attempts to distinguish her case from Williams by arguing that in Williams this court grappled only with the prohibition on active marijuana and did not meaningfully analyze the constitutional implications of the prohibition of driving while carrying marijuana metabolite in the blood are unavailing," the ruling said.

In the Williams decision, the justices said, they "rejected the arguments of those who claimed that the law 'lacked a direct correlation between the prohibited drugs in a driver's system and impairment.'"

---

Conclusion

In this case clearly the justices did not even look at the law, nor he facts of the case.  The intent of the law is to stop someone who is impaired from driving a very heavy, speeding vehicle that will do serious harm to someone else.  In this case, there was no evidence of any potential harm coming to anyone since the substance in question was not the marijuana, but the bodies production of a substance which cleans out marijuana.  It is like saying having bleach or bathroom cleaner is evidence there was illegal substances in your bathroom and therefore you're criminally liable.

Now, I don't mean to cast aspersions on a fine Nevada DUI Attorney, but how do you lose a case on these facts?  Yes, the DUI attorney was looking for the court to declare the law unconstitutional, but it seems nearly a slam dunk.  That last sentence makes assumption of the reader.  I apologize and will correct that assumption now.  The DUI attorney was looking for the Nevada Supreme Court to declare the law unconstitutional.  It is my personal opinion that all courts and police are completely corrupt and run amuck of the constitution ad nauseum.  There is almost no way that any court in the land would declare any law unconstitutional these days, UNLESS, it was so blatantly obvious that even the ignorant, unwashed masses could plainly see it was unconstitutional.  It is the same reasoning we have a 2 billion dollar HIV industry.  They haven't located actual HIV, but they can see antibodies to HIV.  This is the same reasoning.  There was no THC, the substance in marijuana that makes you high, but they found metabolite in her system, nor was she potentially dangerous while driving.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

10 Things That Proves She's Not Into You

She's Just Not That Into You

While researching this topic, I perused many cute and anecdotal quips about modern relationships with women.  None of them had anything to do with the modern woman and how, through bad parenting, a complete lack of social skills, no finishing schools to speak of, women have degraded to the point where you have to weed out the scrubs.  If you're chasing some woman and find it hard to get a date with her, you might want to step back and review who exactly you're trying to chase.  I have come up with 10 things to prove she's not into you.  But, my list also prove she might actually be on the down low to begin with and is just trying to play a role to the public so noone gets suspicious.  Let's face it, being a lesbian is not accepted by everyone, regardless of what you see on MTV or t.v. in general.  The reality is, homosexuality is not a universally accepted way of life, in the real world.  Yes, I know it must hurt some people's feelings for someone to say that out loud, but we're all adults here, or should be.  I write some pretty boring crap.  I hope no child would read this material.  In other words, you could be barking up the wrong tree altogether and don't even know it.  Then, when you fail to get the girl, you beat yourself up, thinking you did something wrong.

This is the general consensus of the "... is just not into you," lists that are floating around.  They all say, somehow it is your fault the other person isn't into you.  Trust me when I say, anyone, can get anyone, given the right time and opportunity.  You could be smelly, old, young, fat, ugly and speak bad English, and still land a super model.  I've seen it.  I've arranged it.  Nuff said!

She's Just Not That Into You List

She's Just Not That Into You

10. When introduced, she failed to mention her name - this should be a huge warning sign.  Also this should prove to you that, this person has a lot to hide.  It is not enough that fake women give fake names and fake numbers, but if a woman doesn't mention her name at all, that's a whole other ball of wax.  Unless she's working for the CIA and is deep deep deep undercover, she should give you her name when you are politely shaking her hand and telling her yours.

9.  She leaves without saying goodbye or nice to meet you - this is classic douchebag mentality.  Having no home training isn't cute, but it could be a warning sign that she is ducking out, and not simply forgetting to be polite.  It would be one thing to be in a long term relationship and be overbearing and need to know where she is all the time.  But, if you just met her and she's ducking out, that's a sign to forget all about her.  At best she has no manners.  At worst, she intentionally did it.  For every douchebag female you meet, there are two sweet and polite ones just wishing to meet you.

8. She refuses any and all drink offers from you - this shows that she is most likely paranoid, and you don't need that sort of baggage.  If any girl refuses a drink from you, in general, you should just move on at that point, regardless of how long you've been talking to her.  At the very least she's telling you that she is not interested in a relationship with you and at the worst, she's a paranoid schizophrenic and might be an axe murderer.  Run!  If you are sitting with friends and buying them drinks and she refuses, you might want to ask her to leave, or get your friends to move to another spot with you.

7. She accepts drinks from you, but says nothing to you - really?  Are you that dumb?  GTFO.  If you buy even one drink for her, or even give her a piece of gum and she doesn't at least pretend to laugh at your corny jokes, it's time for you to get away from her.

6. You just met her and she asks you for something - really?  In this day and age of women's "lib", no woman should ask a man for anything she cannot get by her self.  If you just meet her and she's asking for something, she's a moocher.  If she asks, even for a drink, at a bar, run don't walk, away from her.  She's a user.  Or worse, she thinks she can use you.

5. She always shows up with a friend - it doesn't matter if it's a guy or a girl, a permanent friend, means she needs a chaperon when she's around you.  This does not send off warning signs, per se, but it could mean something a bit deeper.  If she shows up with the same friend all the time, it could mean that "friend" is hers and not just a friend.  You have to read the warning signs carefully.  Stop listening to what people say, "oh she's just a girl friend."  See what is going on in front of you.  She is a "girlfriend".

4. Noone ever knows where she is - it might not just be you she doesn't call or hang out with, her own friends might not have a clue what is going on with her.  This happens a lot.  The friends could be a warning sign that she's unwelcome.  She might not ever be around because her own "friends" do not want her to be.  They might simply be pretending that they don't know where she is, when the truth is that, they never call her.  Or, they could know she hangs out with her "friend" and know not to call her, nor speak about it.  Again, this is one of those, pay attention to what is going on around you.

3.  She looks like a 13 year old boy - this might be just too obvious, but I think some guys do not know.  You cannot know what you don't know.  If the girl has a high and tight, wears plaid, and boots are all steel toes, this should be a huge warning sign to you.  She seriously, not into to you... Hell, she's not into you nor your "kind", and, never will be.  My only regret is that my lesbian friends cannot refurbish an engine.  I really got the short end of the stick.  No benefit anywhere :(  [yup i got jokes]

2. She tells you, that she's a lesbian - again this might seem obvious to most people, but there are guys out there that think this is an actual pickup line.  Let's explore where this confusion comes from.  My lesbian representative informed me that girl on girl "movies" are not actual "women's" "movies", but the sick and twisted fantasies of some poor schlep who had the good fortune to be able to produce his own fantasy on-screen.  So let's fast forward to #2.  The girl tells the guy she's a lesbian and he reverts back to this "movie" that he saw with girl on girl action.  He then interprets it to mean his new found lesbian is in fact a fantasy girl and girl representative, in the flesh, come to show him a wild night out.  Now #2 doesn't seem so far fetched anymore, when I explain it.  Some people are just that confused.

1. She threatens you with bodily harm - this should be the number 1 sign that a girl is just not that into you.

Remember, all that glitters is not gold.  Yes some girls play hard to get.  Some girls play games with guys, just to test them.  To that, I say leave them in the dust.  If a girl feels she has to test you, then you should ditch her as soon as possible.  Why?  Because she's drama.  You do not need drama.  There is someone better looking, richer, can cook and drama free and is just waiting for you to come along.  Drop the elementary school chick and get with a real lady.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl