Pages

Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Friday, August 12, 2011

Newt Gingrich Disproves Global Warming (full video)

Newt Gingrich Disproves Global Warming

I am no fan of Newt Gingrich, but in the video below he actually quotes and cites all his sources, those being of actual scientists and not just sound bites like Al Gore does: "the science is clear"; "the science is firm"; "there is no debating global warming"; "those who oppose global warming are like those who think the lunar landing was staged in Hollywood, a very small segment of scientists." What's more Newt Gingrich gives his credentials before speaking. He actually has grounds to say what he says, because he actually has credentials, where Gore was just Vice President, not a gleaming qualification to get the world in an uproar over man made global warming. I've actually dug up my own independent research, and everything Gore says is completely false.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich
  • icebergs are melting [ yes in the summer they melt slightly every year, for the past 1 billion years]
  • co2 emissions will make sea water rise 20ft in 30 years [completely false, and a prediction, not a fact, based on science that has been completely debunked due to a report that was falsifying information adding ANOTHER 20 degrees to the data]
  • man made co2 is the cause of global warming [completely false, global warming and cooling is done by many factors, the least of which are sun spots and cloud cover that reflects heat radiation back to surface, HENCE our ability to actually live on the planet (what an idiot)]
  • polar bears are dying and drowning [completely debunked, and the scientist that came up with the report has been since removed from office and is under investigation]
  • there is a consensus that global warming is man made [over 10,000 scientists came out of the woodwork to personally sue Mr. Gore, stating there is not a consensus and that the science was completely false]
  • global warming is readily apparent and temperatures are rising like a hockey stick [completely false, and debunked since they only used data over the past 100 years, go back to the middle ages and our temperatures seem like a spec of dust since temperatures during that time were MUCH higher, go back further and further and the middle ages are simply the normal cycle of global temperatures]
  • I've submitted reports showing the science of global warming [all reports submitted to the UN and the IPCC have since been shown to have been falsified, a conspiracy to commit perjury and the data was not submitted to any peer review study]


This is just from the research i've read over.  Newt actually has other data than what I've dug up, but the two corroborate.

Gore is now worth nearly $200 million.  When he left office with clinton he was worth a mere $100,000.  Insiders have said all along this was all about money and global governance, i.e. a one world government.

They keep trying, but everything falls apart.  The EU was actually their first step, which was conceived some 30 years ago.  It is clamoring to stay afloat, but the model is completely flawed.  Spain, Ireland and portugal will be the next to fall, with Greece holding on for dear life.  We [ the federal reserve ] are pouring trillions into the EU, secretly.  They cannot stay afloat by themselves.  They are essentially already in a coma and noone is saying it.  Pull the plug and she's dead.


Please visit my legal website: Las Vegas DUI Lawyer
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Friday, July 29, 2011

Global Warning Scientist Found to Be Fraudulent

Arctic Scientist Under Investigation



By BECKY BOHRER - Associated Press | AP

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Just five years ago, Charles Monnett was one of the scientists whose observation that several polar bears had drowned in the Arctic Ocean helped galvanize the global warming movement.

A Polar Bear Doesn't Bleed from Drowning
Now, the wildlife biologist is on administrative leave and facing accusations of scientific misconduct.

The federal agency where he works told him he was on leave pending the results of an investigation into "integrity issues." A watchdog group believes it has to do with the 2006 journal article about the bear, but a source familiar with the investigation said late Thursday that placing Monnett on leave had nothing to with scientific integrity or the article.

The source, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the ongoing investigation, wouldn't comment further.

The watchdog, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, filed a complaint on Monnett's behalf Thursday with the agency, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.

Investigators have not yet told Monnett of the specific charges or questions related to the scientific integrity of his work, said Jeff Ruch, the watchdog group's executive director. His group released excerpts of interviews investigators conducted with Monnett and fellow researcher Jeffrey Gleason, in which they were questioned about the observations that led to the article.

Whatever the outcome, the investigation comes at a time when climate change activists and those who are skeptical about global warming are battling over the credibility of scientists' work.

Members of both sides, however, said that it was too early to make any pronouncements about the case, particularly since the agency has not yet released the details of the allegations against him.

Myron Ebell, of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said the case reinforces the group's position that people should be more skeptical about the work of climate change scientists.

A Polar Bear Can Swim for 60 Miles
Even if every scientist is objective, "what we're being asked to do is turn our economy around and spend trillions and trillions of dollars on the basis of" climate change claims, he said.

Francesca Grifo, director of the scientific integrity program for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said she's not alarmed by the handling of the case so far.

Grifo said the allegations made in the complaint filed by Ruch's group are premature and said people should wait to see what, if anything, comes of the inspector general's investigation.

Beyond the climate change debate, the investigation also focuses attention on an Obama administration policy intended to protect scientists from political interference.

The complaint seeks Monnett's reinstatement and a public apology from the agency and inspector general, whose office is conducting the probe.

The group's filing also seeks to have the investigation dropped or to have the charges specified and the matter carried out quickly and fairly, as the Obama policy states.

BOEMRE, which oversees leasing and development of offshore drilling, was created last year in the reorganization of the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, which oversaw offshore drilling.

The MMS was abolished after the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The agency was accused of being too close to oil and gas industry interests. A congressional report last year found MMS Alaska was vulnerable to lawsuits and allegations of scientific misconduct.

The agency announced steps to improve.

The Polar Bear Report was a Scam
On July 18, BOEMRE told the longtime Anchorage-based Monnett that he was being put on leave, pending the investigation, according to the complaint. BOEMRE has barred Monnett from speaking to reporters, Ruch said.

Monnett could not immediately be reached Thursday.

His wife, Lisa Rotterman, a fellow scientist who worked with Monnett for years, including at BOEMRE's predecessor agency, said the case did not come out of the blue.

Rotterman said Monnett had come under fire in the past within the agency for speaking the truth about what the science showed. She said the 2006 article wasn't framed in the context of climate change but was relevant to the topic.

She feared what happened to Monnett would send a "chilling message" at the agency just as important oil and gas development decisions in the Arctic will soon be made.

"I don't believe the timing is coincidental," she said.

Rotterman said Monnett's work included identifying questions that needed to be answered to inform the environmental analyses the agency must conduct before issuing drilling permits.

"This is a time when sowing doubt in the public's mind about whether those findings can be trusted or not, that makes people think, I don't know what to believe," she said.

Monnett coordinated much of BOEMRE's research on Arctic wildlife and ecology, had duties that included managing about $50 million worth of studies, according to the complaint.

The agency said other scientists would manage the studies in his absence.

Cinder Blocks around the Necks of Polar Bears was Suspicious
According to documents provided by Ruch's group, which sat in on investigators' interviews with Monnett, the questioning focused on observations that he and researcher Jeffrey Gleason made in 2004.

At the time, they were conducting an aerial survey of bowhead whales, and saw four dead polar bears floating in the water after a storm. There were other witnesses, according to Ruch, and low-resolution photos show floating white blobs.

Monnett and Gleason detailed their observations in an article published two years later in the journal Polar Biology. In the peer-reviewed article, they said they were reporting, to the best of their knowledge, the first observations of the bears floating dead and presumed drowned while apparently swimming long distances.

Polar bears are considered strong swimmers, they wrote, but long-distance swims may exact a greater metabolic toll than standing or walking on ice in better weather.

They said their observations suggested the bears drowned in rough seas and high winds. They also added that the findings "suggest that drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open water periods continues."

The article and presentations drew national attention and helped make the polar bear a symbol for the global warming movement. Former vice president and climate change activist Al Gore mentioned the animal in his Oscar-winning global warming documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth."

2001 - 2010 Sees Record Low Temperatures
The complaint said agency officials harassed Gleason and Monnett, and that they received negative comments after the journal article. Gleason took another Interior Department job; he didn't respond to an email and a BOEMRE spokeswoman said he wouldn't be available for comment.

In May 2008, the bear was classified as a threatened species, the first with its survival at risk due to global warming.

According to a transcript, provided by Ruch's group, Ruch asked investigator Eric May, during questioning of Monnett in February, for specifics about the allegations. May replied: "well, scientific misconduct, basically, uh, wrong numbers, uh, miscalculations."

Monnett said that alleging scientific misconduct "suggests that we did something deliberately to deceive or to, to change it. Um, I sure don't see any indication of that in what you're asking me about."


Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl


Thursday, June 10, 2010

Is Carbon Bad: Real Science, Not Guess Work

The Real Science Behind Carbon


Humans are made up of 18% carbon.  So the daily toll of humans dying on the planet accounts for more carbon emissions than all the industrial output on the planet i.e. industry, cars, home use.  Not only do dead humans put out carbon when they die, they continuously put out carbon emissions over the centuries as they are buried, must faster if they themselves are burned [barbaric practice].

Plants, including trees, grasses and algae in the ocean, intake carbon for their growth.  The more carbon emitted into the atmosphere the better the yield on craps and plants.  In fact, in one summer carbon in the atmosphere can drop to by 10 parts per million, i.e. plants suck up lots of carbon. 

The people who are trying to impose a tax on us are trying to have both sides of the argument:
  •  if global warming occurs sea levels will rise
  •  if global warming occurs seas will evaporate, causing more cloud formations which will thrust us into a new ice age


You cannot have both sides of the arguments.  If the planet were to raise in temperature, and it was so drastic that sea levels were affected, the seas would recede, not rise.  Also, if there was a rise in temperature and the sea levels receded, it would not cause a tremendous vapor rush from evaporation of the ocean to cause clouds.  Water does not expand when it gets hotter, it gets smaller.  When water freezes it expands, i.e. ice is larger than water.

The second part of the emissions are animal life.  With increased carbon emissions animal life flourishes.  In the case of oceanic plankton, it is a direct increase.  Other animals increase due to better grazing, due to increased plant growth.


The huge lie that is glaringly missing from the argument that carbon emissions are higher now and thus will cause global warming, is found in the fact that carbon levels are not higher despite all of their graphs showing how many emissions have occurred in the past century.  Where is the missing carbon?

  • increased growth of forests, especially in North America;
  • increased amounts of phytoplankton in the oceans;
  • uptake by desert soils (mechanism as yet unknown). 

That's right, all this missing carbon, that has gone into overdrive, according to the liars, has been sucked up by plants.  They won't tell you about the massive hole in their theory nor where the huge hole went, i.e. plants ate it.


Know Your Science



The only defense we have to people trying to impose taxes on us, based on a scientific argument is to actually go and research the science.  These people are clearly lying to all of us.  In fact, they have paid off researchers to lie for them.  It took the concerted efforts of other real scientists to put a stop to the charade.

The end result was that big business would get more money.  This was a shakedown to end all shakedowns.  How to get lots of money from the population and give it to big business.  When I say big businesses, I mean the global conglomerates, that all the horror movies are made from.

You need to mobilize yourselves and band together to vote anyone out of office that practices such open and obvious criminal activity.  Be adult about these issues and do not bury your head in the sand, hoping it will go away.  WE all want the easy life, but not at the expense of our very lives.




 Please visit my legal website: DUI
See me on YouTube: Shakaama Live
Need a Notary in Las Vegas Nevada Notary Public Nevada