Harold Camping is Liar and a Is Not a Christian

End of the World is Not Tomorrow

Anyone that says the world is going to end tomorrow, next week, or next year is not a Christian and is a Satanist.  You should have enough knowledge of how the Bible works and what Christians are supposed to do, to know this.  Even atheists know this to be true.  I challenge anyone who says that the world is going to end, show me what they have been doing in the past 10 years, and I will show you a Satanist.  You cannot both believe in god and believe that you can PREDICT the end of the world.  Unless you are a very uneducated Christian you should know the last gift of the holy trinity was the holy spirit.  Once the holy spirit was given to man, there was no need of prophecy and prophets and someone else to interpret what the lord has in store for you.  The holy spirit is supposed to commune with everyone on the planet.  You either believe in the holy spirit as a Christian or you are not a Christian.  You cannot have both.  Yes this means, there is no need for you to listen to a minister tell you every Sunday what you need to do, once you have accepted Christ.  Sure, study the bible and learn what you're supposed to do, but there is no need for repetitive meeting with a congregation to hear the call to Christianity.  Does that make sense?  Once you've accepted the call to Christianity, what need have you of hearing it over and over.

Let's take a look at Harold Camping.

At the center of it all, Camping's organization, Family Radio, is perfectly happy to take your money -- and in fact, received $80 million in contributions between 2005 and 2009. Camping founded Family Radio, a nonprofit Christian radio network based in Oakland, Calif. with about 65 stations across the country, in 1958.

According to their most recent IRS filings, Family Radio is almost entirely funded by donations, and brought in $18 million in contributions in 2009 alone.

What the 2009 IRS filings don't show, is how the organization's donations and expenses may have changed during 2010 and leading up to the May 21 Judgment Day prediction.

In the last few months, Family Radio billboards have popped up across the country. And the group purchased RVs to drive around the country on its evangelizing missions.

Those expenses could have changed their financial picture, but since Family Radio doesn't have to turn in their next IRS filing until November, it may not even matter.

What's rather crazy is this guy has a multi-million dollar bunker for his true believers, to hunker down in.  Either the world is going to end, or it isn't.  Make up your mind Harry.  Also, they changed the date.  It WAS the 22nd, but then they changed it to 21st.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Barbaric Circumcision to Finally End in the U.S.

Circumcision Ban to Appear on San Francisco Ballot

Lloyd Schofield has come one step closer to achieving his mission to ban circumcision -- the surgical removal of the penile foreskin -- in the City by the Bay.

Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO—A group seeking to ban the circumcision of male children in San Francisco has succeeded in getting their controversial measure on the November ballot, meaning voters will be asked to weigh in on what until now has been a private family matter.

Lloyd Schofield

City elections officials confirmed Wednesday that the initiative had received enough signatures to appear on the ballot, getting more than 7,700 valid signatures from city residents. Initiatives must receive at least 7,168 signatures to qualify.

If the measure passes, circumcision would be prohibited among males under the age of 18. The practice would become a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or up to one year in jail. There would be no religious exemptions.

The initiative appears to be the first of its kind in the country to actually make it to this stage, though a larger national debate over the health benefits of circumcision has been going on for many years. Banning circumcision would almost certainly prompt a flurry of legal challenges alleging violations of the First Amendment's guarantee of the freedom to exercise one's religious beliefs.

Supporters of the ban say male circumcision is a form of genital mutilation that is unnecessary, extremely painful and even dangerous. They say parents should not be able to force the decision on their young child.

"Parents are really guardians, and guardians have to do what's in the best interest of the child. It's his body. It's his choice," said Lloyd Schofield, the measure's lead proponent and a longtime San Francisco resident, who said the cutting away of the foreskin from the penis is a more invasive medical procedure than many new parents or childless individuals realize.

But opponents say such claims are alarmingly misleading, and call the proposal a clear violation of constitutionally protected religious freedoms.

"For a city that's renowned for being progressive and open-minded, to even have to consider such an intolerant proposition ... it sets a dangerous precedent for all cities and states," said Rabbi Gil Yosef Leeds of Berkeley. Rabbi Leeds is a certified "mohel," the person who traditionally performs ritual circumcisions in the Jewish faith.

He said he receives phone calls every day from members of the local Jewish community who are concerned about the proposed ban. But he said he is relatively confident that even if the measure is approved, it will be abruptly—and indefinitely—tied up in litigation.

The initiative's backers say its progress is the biggest success story to date in a decades-old, nationwide movement by so-called "intactivists" to end circumcision of male infants in the U.S. A similar effort to introduce a circumcision ban in the Massachusetts Legislature last year failed to gain traction.

"It's been kind of under the radar until now, but it was a conversation that needed to happen," Mr. Schofield said of the debate over male circumcision. "We've tapped into a spark with our measure—something that's been going on for a long time."

International health organizations have promoted circumcision as an important strategy for reducing the spread of the AIDS virus. That's based on studies that showed it can prevent AIDS among heterosexual men in Africa.

But there hasn't been the same kind of push for circumcision in the U.S., in part because nearly 80% of American men are already circumcised, a much higher proportion than the worldwide average of 30%. Also, HIV spreads mainly among gay men in the U.S., and research indicates circumcision doesn't protect gay men from HIV.

The CDC doesn't have a position on the San Francisco proposal, said the spokeswoman, Elizabeth-Ann Chandler.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Obama Silent on 28% Black Unemployment Rate

Obama Meets Congressional Black Caucus on the Eve of Campaigning

When confronted, by reporters, about Obama's complete silence about the 28% Black unemployment rate, the leader of the Congressional Black Caucus began to stammer and stutter, during a public address. 
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told The Huffington Post that CBC Members expressed “the frustration of our constituents” over high unemployment to Obama during a Thursday meeting at the White House. The Labor Department puts unemployment at 16.1 percent in the black community, but Cleaver said the number is more like 28 percent when factoring in “99ers,” or people who have exhausted all of their regular and extended unemployment benefits.

Obama Meets with Congressional Black Caucus

“All you’ve got to do is come into any black area and you can see that,” he said.
In the lead-up to the meeting with Obama, the CBC used its Facebook page to ask supporters which priorities lawmakers should bring up with the president. The response was “unbelievable,” Cleaver said. “I’d say 97 percent said to ask about jobs.”


As a holder of a political science degree, it is amazing to me how the Black community defends their unwavering support of Obama, in the face of obvious disdain.  Obama has said, during his campaign that he would not entertain any ANY Black issues.  Obama during his presidency has said he will NOT entertain ANY Black issues.  All other political groups have garnered, not only, favors from Obama for their votes, but after handing over funds and votes, received exactly what they demanded of him. 

The Black community sent no lobbyist to the Obama campaign and yet AND STILL turned out a voting block never before seen in the Black community.  And, they got exactly what they asked for, NOTHING.

The CBC is completely emasculated on every Black issue, when it comes to Obama.  28% staggering unemployment in the Black community and Obama will say nothing about it.  One reporter from New York, stood up during a white house speech and asked what he plans to do about a 50% unemployment rate in Black men in New York.  Obama refused to even acknowledge the Black community even had a problem.

At what point does the Black community wake up and stop pandering to someone that has absolutely no qualms about telling us to go away and don't ask questions.

At what point does the Black community realize that Obama is NOT a Black president, when he makes it clear and to the point that he will NOT help the Black community.

It is outrageous that the nearly 2nd largest voting block in the nation is completely ignored by the "Black" president and BOTH political parties who are in control.

I am disgusted with this complete lack of awareness.

 Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl

Major News Network Caught Airing Fake News

Media Lies

It amazes me the amount of disinformation, fake footage, skewed facts and out and out lies, the news tells the American public every night.  Equally amazing is the complete lack of interest of that same American public in actually finding out the truth.  Even more shocking is the vehemence with which they will fight you if you simply tell them the truth.  People immediately jump to the conclusion that Fox News would the the ones that report fake news.  They also believe that fake news reports are issued by their parent corporation.  However, both instances are completely false.  Everyone issues fake news and the news issued is not done so by GE or whatever corporation of the station.

A Completely Made up Screenshot

The term fake news has become synonymous with government and corporate sponsored pre-packaged news provided as video news releases (VNRs) and audio news releases (ANRs) to news outlets.

The Center for Media and Democracy, issued a report entitled "Fake TV News: Widespread and Undisclosed". The multi-media report tracked television stations' use of selected VNRs over 10 months. The report summary states:

"CMD identified 77 television stations, from those in the largest to the smallest markets, that aired these VNRs or related satellite media tours (SMTs) in 98 separate instances, without disclosure to viewers. Collectively, these 77 stations reach more than half of the U.S. population. ... In almost all cases, stations failed to balance the clients' messages with independently-gathered footage or basic journalistic research. More than one-third of the time, stations aired the pre-packaged VNR in its entirety."

In a follow up CMD issued a report entitled "Still Not the News: Stations Overwhelmingly Fail to Disclose VNRs." Although the research period for this report was shorter -- only six months -- dozens more undisclosed VNR broadcasts were documented. The report summary states:

"Of the 54 total VNR broadcasts described in this report, 48 provided no disclosure of the nature or source of the sponsored video. In the six other cases, disclosure was fleeting and often ambiguous."

Along with the release of each report, CMD and the media reform group Free Press filed a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting enforcement of the Commission's sponsorship identification requirements with regard to VNRs. In August 2006, the FCC sent letters of inquiry to the owners of the 77 television stations named in CMD's first report.

War Room Photo Later Revealed as Fake

Some of the VNR's are blatantly obvious, but others are not.  Remember, the government issues VNR's as well.  That is to say, the government packages together a complete story and footage that they use to promote themselves and give it to news networks, major and small.  These are not disclosed to the public.  For instance, the entire Bin Laden footage was not real.  The facts of the "story" have been all over the place and key people have contradicted themselves and other key people in the administration.  They have disqualified nearly everyone of the cabinet members in statements saying that "that person did not know what they were talking about."  Piecing the statements together that the CIA representatives, what was presented on the news, and comments made to reporters, there is no possible way that a clandestine operation took place less than a week ago.  The photos of the death have been deemed to be forensic fakes as well.

The Usama Bin Laden assassination is a prime and blatant example of a VNR put out by the government.  No media outlet, at this point, nor even the FCC would dare reveal that it is a VNR.  Not only would they fear severe reprisal by the government, but more than likely would fear for their very lives.  Other than a comedian talk show host, like John Stewart or Stephen Colbert, would break the story that the Bin Laden story is fake.

That being said, I knew about the story before the news reported it.  I knew it was coming down the line.  And, I knew it was completely and utterly false.

How to Identify a VNR or Fake News Report

Given that stations will not disclose that a particular piece if a fake news report or a "sponsored" piece, one has to wonder, how can one tell if a segment is real news or fake news.  There are plenty of hints in the video itself and or if the piece centers around something that you cannot help but be exposed to:

• a particular product is mentioned more than twice in a segment
• a particular product is shown more than twice in a segment
• a company is mentioned more than twice in a segment
• a government agency is mentioned more than twice in a segment
• a government operation is glorified and complimented in a segment
• a plea to your emotions is evoked in a segment [ "this is tragic" "this is terrible" "this is fantastic" ]
• one of the only two political parties is vilified in a segment
• one of the only two political parties is glorified in a segment
• a religion is mentioned twice in a segment
• a religious dignitary that is completely foreign to the normal American religions is the center of a segment
• a government agency or branch is the center of a segment
• a law is mentioned and applied as if it were fact, especially when it is still being voted on

Some of the points are shocking and one is left wondering how can any news be real, if all of the points are true. That, my friend, is the problem. A lot of "news" is completely made up, fake or propaganda for some entity that you don't know about.  It would shock many Americans how much sway, something like the Catholic and Vatican City has over the presidency and congress.  It would shock many Americans how often corporations draft and "market" legislation through our own government.  That marketing takes the form of news casts, news papers and magazines.  The American public does not realize that it is being marketed to, however.  They take everything said in the news as factual and not a marketing ploy.

When companies, like ours, explain that what they are watching is nearly 90% marketing, the American reaction is typical and denialistic.

• Noone wants to believe that we have an undocumented person as a sitting US president. 
• Noone wants to believe that Bin Laden was not killed 6 days ago. 
• Noone wants to believe that Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11. 
• Noone wants to believe that Israel is an aggressor in the middle east and not the other way around. 
• Noone wants to believe that the CIA is the entity that incited revolt in middle eastern countries and not a sudden up-swell for a wish for more freedom in an all Muslim country. 
• Noone wants to believe that there is no monolithic terrorist organization out to get America. 
• Noone wants to believe that the government answers to corporate beck and call. 
• Noone wants to believe the Mothers Against Drunk Drivers is not a benevolent organization and is in fact an organization hell bent on prohibition instead and forces the hand of every state in the union with threats of ousting state legislators. 
• Noone wants to believe that the influx of illegal immigrants serves the purpose of corporations to erode the middle class and gain a new slave labor pool, in contravention of what the government says.  Remember, the government is at the beck and call of corporations. 
• Noone wants to believe that the two party political system is in fact a single party political system that parades before you in an alleged show of being opposite one another.
• Noone wants to believe that the US government can get along perfectly well without all of the American income tax [ that right there is a 3 part story branching into corporate bullying to get themselves exempted from taxation; getting tariffs lifted from imports; and sticking the bill on American citizens, who were never intended as part of the taxation deal ]

Corporate America and the US government has done a mass campaign for years on the American public.  They have done it so well, that now no facts nor the truth is ever shown to the public.  VNR's are nothing more than marketing.  The government does it.  Corporations do it.  Companies do it.  They market everything from dish-washing liquid to joining the army to raising taxes with your blessing for more wars, i.e. more money for military contractors.

My fear is that one day we will wake up and the entier story of "Shadowrun" will be true.  Mega-corporations will rule the planet and the only technology available to the public will be the stuff they let us have.  Governments will be merely there in name only, blatantly so.  It is already happening.

Please visit my legal website: Nevada DUI Attorneys
See me on YouTube: Seattle Cop Punches Black Teenage Girl